Cosmic Radiation - how is our sun's speed calculated?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lenfromkits
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Radiation Speed
AI Thread Summary
The speed of our sun through space is calculated using the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) radiation, specifically by analyzing its anisotropic dipole. This analysis relies on the Doppler effect, where radiation appears blueshifted in the direction of motion and redshifted in the opposite direction, creating a dipole pattern. By comparing the frequency of this dipole radiation to isotropic radiation, scientists can deduce our velocity relative to a frame where the radiation appears uniform. The calculations assume a consistent level of isotropy in the CMB radiation. Understanding this connection clarifies how our speed is determined through these observations.
lenfromkits
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
From the anisotropic dipole of the CMB, they are able to calculate our velocity through space relative to this radiation. How exactly is this done - in general terms. What assumptions are they needing to make ab out this radiation to deduce our speed from it?

I don't understand the connection between observing the radiation and identifying our speed relative to it.

Thanks!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
The connection is basically just the Doppler effect. The radiation will appear blueshifted in the direction of motion and redshifted in the opposite direction. That's why there is a dipole in the first place. This can tell you the velocity relative to a frame of reference in which the radiation appears isotropic (down to a level of one part in 105 of course :wink:)
 
cepheid said:
The connection is basically just the Doppler effect. The radiation will appear blueshifted in the direction of motion and redshifted in the opposite direction. That's why there is a dipole in the first place. This can tell you the velocity relative to a frame of reference in which the radiation appears isotropic (down to a level of one part in 105 of course :wink:)

Oh... I think I'm getting it now. It sounds like you mean they are comparing the frequency of the dipole radiation to the frequency of the non-dipole radiation. The difference in frequency represents the speed at which we are traveling (ie, based on the doppler shift of this frequency that is)?

Thanks for the explanation.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top