What is the boundary of the observable universe in the Milne universe?

  • Thread starter Thread starter micomaco86572
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cosmology
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the distinctions between cosmological horizon and particle horizon in cosmology, particularly within the context of the Milne universe. Participants express confusion over whether the commonly referenced cosmological horizon is synonymous with the cosmological event horizon. The conversation highlights that for particle horizons to exist, the universe's expansion rate must be infinite at time zero, a condition not met in the Milne universe. Despite this, the Milne universe still has a boundary of the observable universe, raising questions about its classification as a particle horizon. Overall, the thread emphasizes the complexities of cosmological horizons and their interpretations.
micomaco86572
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
What is the difference of cosmological horizon and particle horizon in cosmology?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Nobody knows the answer?
 
chronon said:
Take a look at http://www.chronon.org/Articles/cosmichorzns.html and http://www.chronon.org/articles/Cosmological_Event_Horizon.html on my website

Thx Chronon! I benefited a lot from your website, which is really cool! lol!

I have two more question: the cosmological horizon people often talk about actually means the the cosmological event horizon, doesn't it?
You said:"for particle horizons to occur the rate of expansion of the universe (the derivative of the scale factor with time) must be infinite at time zero.", why?
 
Last edited:
micomaco86572 said:
the cosmological horizon people often talk about actually means the the cosmological event horizon, doesn't it?
I think that 'people' are sometimes confused about the issue, but that would be the most reasonable interpretation of cosmological horizon.
micomaco86572 said:
You said:"for particle horizons to occur the rate of expansion of the universe (the derivative of the scale factor with time) must be infinite at time zero.", why?
Well a freely coasting a universe without large scale gravity or cosmological constant - the (0,0) universe, also known as the Milne universe - doesn't have particle horizons. If you transform to conformal coordinates (See http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmo_03.htm#MSTD) then the conformal time goes back to minus inifinity.
 
But in the Milne universe we still have the boundary of the observable universe, do we? Can we refer to it as a particle horizon? thx
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top