MHB Cost of 2x number of roses is not double the cost of x number of roses.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Asawira Emaan
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The cost of six roses is not simply double the cost of three roses due to the fixed cost component in the pricing formula, C(r) = 2 + 5r. When evaluating the expression for six roses, C(2r), it results in 2 + 10r, while doubling the cost of three roses, 2C(r), yields 4 + 10r. This shows that the fixed cost of 2 remains constant regardless of the quantity, leading to a discrepancy in the total cost. Therefore, the relationship between the costs is not linear, confirming that the cost does not double as the quantity doubles. Understanding this pricing structure is crucial for accurate budgeting in floral purchases.
Asawira Emaan
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Asalamoalikum,
Explain why the cost of six roses is not double the cost of three roses?

Hint: Think about a expression for cost of roses r, 2 + 5r.
What if the expression for cost was just 5r instead?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
For the first part of the problem, we are given:

$$C(r)=2+5r$$

And we are asked to determine if the following is true:

$$C(2r)=2C(r)$$

Or:

$$2+5(2r)=2(2+5r)$$

After you distribute, do you find this true?
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K