Cost of setting up a sattelite?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zaros
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sattelite
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
7 replies · 2K views
Zaros
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A scientist wants to put an 100kg experimental package in orbit around the Earth. The cost of deployment depends on the amount of extra energy it takes to get it into the required position i.e. how much more energy is used than just sending the rocket up there.
a) Determine the amount of work that must be done to get the package to 1 000km above the Earth’s surface.
b) Determine the amount of extra work needed to put the package into a circular orbit at this height.

Homework Equations



W=F*d
F=(G*m1m2)/r2

The Attempt at a Solution



a) W=F*d
F=FG
=(Gm1m2)r2
=(6.67 * 10-11 * 100 * ME)/(RE + 1000000)2
= 731 N
W= F*d = 730 * 1000000
= 7.31 *108
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Work is equal to kinetic energy i.e. W= 1/2 mv2
Is that what your getting at?
 
W = KE + PE = 1/2 mv2 + mgh
Is that right?
 
then should i use the F= (G*m1*m2)/r2 instead so that would lead to
F= 1/2 mv2 + h((G*m1*m2)/r2)

Now is this correct?
 
Zaros said:
then should i use the F= (G*m1*m2)/r2 instead so that would lead to
F= 1/2 mv2 + h((G*m1*m2)/r2)

Now is this correct?

Stop just throwing equations at the problem. You equated F, Force, with an energy. Not good. You need to stop and think about the problem.

What would your change in potential energy be if you were to take the package on the ground with 0 kinetic energy and put it up into space at the height required and still not let it have any kinetic energy?