Cost of setting up a sattelite?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Zaros
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sattelite
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the work required to place a 100kg package into orbit at 1,000 km above Earth's surface. The initial calculations involve using gravitational force equations, but there is confusion regarding the application of work-energy principles. Participants emphasize the need to consider both potential and kinetic energy, noting that work is not simply equated to force. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the relationship between gravitational potential energy and the work done against gravity. Ultimately, the correct approach involves calculating the change in potential energy to determine the work needed for deployment.
Zaros
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A scientist wants to put an 100kg experimental package in orbit around the Earth. The cost of deployment depends on the amount of extra energy it takes to get it into the required position i.e. how much more energy is used than just sending the rocket up there.
a) Determine the amount of work that must be done to get the package to 1 000km above the Earth’s surface.
b) Determine the amount of extra work needed to put the package into a circular orbit at this height.

Homework Equations



W=F*d
F=(G*m1m2)/r2

The Attempt at a Solution



a) W=F*d
F=FG
=(Gm1m2)r2
=(6.67 * 10-11 * 100 * ME)/(RE + 1000000)2
= 731 N
W= F*d = 730 * 1000000
= 7.31 *108
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Zaros said:
W=F*d
That is true only for a constant force.

You need to use something else. Hint: What is the relation between work and energy?
 
Work is equal to kinetic energy i.e. W= 1/2 mv2
Is that what your getting at?
 
What about potential energy?
 
W = KE + PE = 1/2 mv2 + mgh
Is that right?
 
No. That mgh term is assuming a uniform gravity field.
 
then should i use the F= (G*m1*m2)/r2 instead so that would lead to
F= 1/2 mv2 + h((G*m1*m2)/r2)

Now is this correct?
 
Zaros said:
then should i use the F= (G*m1*m2)/r2 instead so that would lead to
F= 1/2 mv2 + h((G*m1*m2)/r2)

Now is this correct?

Stop just throwing equations at the problem. You equated F, Force, with an energy. Not good. You need to stop and think about the problem.

What would your change in potential energy be if you were to take the package on the ground with 0 kinetic energy and put it up into space at the height required and still not let it have any kinetic energy?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
5K
Back
Top