A Could a CPL parametrization be included into Brans-Dicke model?

fab13
Messages
300
Reaction score
7
TL;DR
After doing some forecasts with w_0,wa CDM, I would like to know if i can keep the same structure of the code but with generating Matter power spectra of Brans-Dicke
I have studied up to now about forecasts to constrain cosmological parameters in the context of CPL( Chevallier-Polarski-Linder ) parametrization with w_0, ,w_a parameters in equation of state for cosmic fluid.

For this, I have used Matter power spectra ("fake data") generated by CAMB and CLASS codes.

Now, I have to study the Brans-Dicke model : I think about generating Matter power spectra with CLASS (or rather Hi-CLASS) which has an option to generate specific Matter power spectra dedicated to Brans-Dicke framework.

I would like to know if I could keep the CPL parametrization in Brans-Dicke model, i.e generating Brans-Dicke Matter power spectra and include them into the forecast code in order to assess constraints on classical cosmological parameters and also on w_0,w_a parameters.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, could this post be transfered to "

Beyond the Standard Model Forum " forum ? , I think this would be more suitable

 
Could anyone give me some clues or some elements of answer ? The 2 modified models could co-exist ?

Thanks
 
Jacobson’s work (1995) [1] demonstrated that Einstein’s equations can be derived from thermodynamic principles, suggesting gravity might emerge from the thermodynamic behavior of spacetime, tied to the entropy of horizons. Other researchers, such as Bekenstein [2] and Verlinde [3], have explored similar ideas, linking gravity to entropy and holographic principles. I’m interested in discussing how these thermodynamic approaches might apply to quantum gravity, particularly at the Planck...

Similar threads

Replies
62
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
446
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
24
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K