A Could a CPL parametrization be included into Brans-Dicke model?

fab13
Messages
300
Reaction score
7
TL;DR Summary
After doing some forecasts with w_0,wa CDM, I would like to know if i can keep the same structure of the code but with generating Matter power spectra of Brans-Dicke
I have studied up to now about forecasts to constrain cosmological parameters in the context of CPL( Chevallier-Polarski-Linder ) parametrization with w_0, ,w_a parameters in equation of state for cosmic fluid.

For this, I have used Matter power spectra ("fake data") generated by CAMB and CLASS codes.

Now, I have to study the Brans-Dicke model : I think about generating Matter power spectra with CLASS (or rather Hi-CLASS) which has an option to generate specific Matter power spectra dedicated to Brans-Dicke framework.

I would like to know if I could keep the CPL parametrization in Brans-Dicke model, i.e generating Brans-Dicke Matter power spectra and include them into the forecast code in order to assess constraints on classical cosmological parameters and also on w_0,w_a parameters.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, could this post be transfered to "

Beyond the Standard Model Forum " forum ? , I think this would be more suitable

 
Could anyone give me some clues or some elements of answer ? The 2 modified models could co-exist ?

Thanks
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
Back
Top