Could a Nuetrino Laser Cause Damage Without Interacting Electromagnetically?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Albertgauss
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laser Relativity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the hypothetical effects of a neutrino laser, specifically whether such a device could cause damage to a target without electromagnetic interaction. Participants explore the nature of neutrinos, their interactions, and the energy levels required for any potential effects on matter.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether a neutrino laser could cause damage, noting that while photons and other particles interact electromagnetically, neutrinos do not, but they do interact via the Weak Force.
  • Another participant suggests that for high-energy neutrinos (around 1 GeV), a flux of approximately 1022 neutrinos per second could be felt, equating this to the energy of a kiloton of TNT.
  • A third participant points out the ambiguity in the term "neutrino laser," questioning the definition and how it differs from a neutrino beam.
  • One participant expresses confusion about the terminology and clarifies that they meant a tight neutrino beam rather than a laser, acknowledging the surprising notion that a neutrino beam with immense energy might only produce minimal effects on matter.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the terminology and implications of a "neutrino laser," with some agreeing on the potential for neutrinos to carry energy without significant interaction, while others challenge the clarity of the concept itself. No consensus is reached regarding the feasibility or definition of a neutrino laser.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the lack of clear definitions and assumptions regarding what constitutes a "neutrino laser" versus a neutrino beam, as well as the complexities involved in calculating potential effects on matter.

Albertgauss
Gold Member
Messages
298
Reaction score
38
Would a nuetrino laser cause any damage if aimed at a target and the nuetrinos had sufficiently high, ultra-relavisitic energy? Obviously, photons, and relativistic collimated beams of protons, electrons, etc. would do damage, but all such "lasers" interact with electromagnetism. They destroy a target because they interact electromagnetically with the atoms in a target.

Nuetrinos do not interact electromagnetically, but they still have mass, and they interact with the Weak Force. Perhaps they wouldn't tear atoms apart, but they could possibly tear nuclei apart (weak force).

Does anyone know of any calculation done that is "back of envelope" on how many nuetrinos and at what energy would be needed for them to be noticed, "felt" by a target or a human, without any special equipment? For lack of better analogy, if I got in the path of such a nuetrino laser, what would their numbers be and how many would be needed for my skin to be vaporized, sun-tanned, cell damage, etc.

I understand nuetrinos are incredibly almost massless and non-interacting, but I was curious about their energies and numbers to "feel them" as I might "feel" a laser.
 
Science news on Phys.org
1) This has nothing to do with relativity.

2) Laser is a really bad word choice - that refers to mechanisms specific to atomic or molecular transitions and photons.

3) I'm probably off by a few factors here, but I get that for 1 Gev neutrinos (you want high energy ones for higher cross section), if you had about 10^22 per second going through a small spot (millimeter or so), you should definitely feel it. However, 10^22 Gev of neutrinos would have the energy of about 1 kiloton of TNT. So if you could concentrate energy equivalent to a Nagasaki atom bombs every 10 seconds into a tight neutrino beam, you should be able to feel a bit of heat on a spot on your hand (probably about like a 25 milliwatt laser)
 
Albertgauss said:
Would a nuetrino laser cause any damage if aimed at a target and the nuetrinos had sufficiently high, ultra-relavisitic energy? Obviously, photons, and relativistic collimated beams of protons, electrons, etc. would do damage, but all such "lasers" interact with electromagnetism. They destroy a target because they interact electromagnetically with the atoms in a target.

Nuetrinos do not interact electromagnetically, but they still have mass, and they interact with the Weak Force. Perhaps they wouldn't tear atoms apart, but they could possibly tear nuclei apart (weak force).

Does anyone know of any calculation done that is "back of envelope" on how many nuetrinos and at what energy would be needed for them to be noticed, "felt" by a target or a human, without any special equipment? For lack of better analogy, if I got in the path of such a nuetrino laser, what would their numbers be and how many would be needed for my skin to be vaporized, sun-tanned, cell damage, etc.

I understand nuetrinos are incredibly almost massless and non-interacting, but I was curious about their energies and numbers to "feel them" as I might "feel" a laser.

This is utterly vague. What exactly is a "neutrino laser"? What is the difference between that and a simple neutrino beam? What makes it a "laser"? What you described has nothing to do, for example, with what we get from a FEL.

You simply cannot expect a discussion on something that has not been defined.

Zz.
 
Last edited:
Sorry for putting this in the wrong section. I wasn't sure if it would go here or in the Particle Physics Group. I thought it might go in relativity because I was talking about particles near light speed and with relativisitic energies.

I meant beam. When I was thinking through this, I was using the language of laser to imply a tight nuetrino beam. So a particle beam is what I was after.

PAllen summed it up best for me. It seems that nuetrinos could carry an enormous amount of energy, and still not have any effect on any matter. A beam of nuetrinos with enough energy as many atomic bombs, and would only warm up your hand is incredible to me. So that is what I was looking for.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K