Could an Eight-Part Year Have Existed in Ancient Northern Europe?

  • Context: History 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Helios
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Year
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of an eight-part solar year in ancient Northern Europe, distinct from the Julian calendar. It highlights the mathematical framework for defining this year based on the Sun's ecliptic longitude at specific angles, particularly at a special latitude of approximately 55.7682°. The conversation emphasizes that while modern neo-pagans associate cross-quarter days with contemporary calendars, this practice overlooks the historical context of timekeeping prior to the Julian calendar. The need for a reliable seasonal measure for agricultural practices is underscored, suggesting that indigenous peoples likely developed their own methods of tracking time based on solar positions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of solar ecliptic longitude and its significance in astronomy
  • Familiarity with the concepts of solstices, equinoxes, and cross-quarters
  • Basic knowledge of trigonometric functions and their application in astronomy
  • Awareness of historical calendar systems and their agricultural implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical principles behind solar positioning and ecliptic longitude
  • Explore ancient agricultural practices and their reliance on astronomical events
  • Investigate the historical context of timekeeping methods in pre-Christian Northern Europe
  • Learn about the differences between lunar and solar calendars and their uses in various cultures
USEFUL FOR

Historians, astronomers, agricultural scientists, and anyone interested in ancient timekeeping methods and their relevance to seasonal agriculture.

Helios
Messages
267
Reaction score
63
What were the methods of time-keeping for northern Europe before the Christian epoch and apart from the Julian calendar? Apart from lunar reckoning, there is also historical mention of an eight-part solar year, with solstices, equinoxes, and cross-quarters.
Today there are "neo-pagans" who have their models of an eight-part year, but they merely attach their cross-quarter days to the Julian or Gregorian calendar. This is naive because there was no Julian calendar in use there around the very time when this wisdom supposedly originated. The question remains as to how an eight-part year could have been perceived long ago. Unless the reconstruction of an eight-part year method of time reckoning, independent of the counting of days, can be demonstrated, the past existence of an extinct eight-part year remains puzzling.

Let's look at the mathematics of this. Let's suppose an eight-part year is defined by the Sun's ecliptic longitude = 0°, 45°, 90°, 135°, 180°, 225°, 270°, 315°. We'll also find the special latitude L* where the summer Sun rises at north-east and sets at north-west. Here are the relevant equations;

sin ( DECLINATION ) = cos ( LATITIDE ) sin ( AMPLITUDE )
sin ( DECLINATION ) = sin ( ECLIPTIC LONGITUDE ) sin ( OBLIQUITY )
[ SQR 2 ] sin ( OBLIQUITY ) = cos ( L* )
[ SQR 2 ] sin( AMPLITUDE ) = sin( ECLIPTIC LONGITUDE ) at L*

The special latitude L* is approximately 55.7682°. Here, the year can be tracked by the azimuth of sunrise from the east at 0°, 30°, 45°, 30°, 0°, -30°, -45°, -30°, or likewise for sunsets from the west. Because all these angles can be easily drawn by any geometer, unlearned in the ways of trigonometry, I think the peoples long ago, indigenous to this vicinity of this special latitude would have discovered this for themselves and it is here that the eight-part year could have originated and be used as seasonal measure.
I know there are little issues like refraction, the apparent size of the sun's disc, or the slightly unequal duration of the eight parts due to the Earth's eccentric orbit.
 
Science news on Phys.org
The ancients were interested in astronomy and calendars because it helped them farm. Equinoxes and solstices provide a natural division of the year into four parts, but nothing particularly important happens half way between one and the other. The correct time to plant seeds would be the same each year, but different in different locations. So you need someone who can say "The solstice was 71 days ago, it's time to start plowing."

The other calendar influencer would be the moon. This produces 13 per year, but drifts slowly, and so isn't as good for farmers. Hunters though would find the moon more important. When they notice something like the full moon rising before the sun has set, they know it is now spring.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K