Could an ion engine attached to a satellite be used to stabilize orbit?

AI Thread Summary
Satellites not positioned at Lagrange points experience orbital decay due to atmospheric drag, leading to eventual re-entry. An ion engine could theoretically be used to counteract this decay by providing a continuous thrust, although simpler propulsion systems are often preferred due to lower complexity and the minimal velocity change required over a satellite's lifespan. The International Space Station (ISS) utilizes periodic boosts to maintain its orbit, which are executed with low acceleration and minimal vibrations. Solar energy could power a small ion engine, allowing satellites to operate without refueling, as most require electric energy for functionality. Overall, while ion engines can stabilize orbits, practical considerations often lead to alternative propulsion methods being favored.
vjk2
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
Basically, my understanding is that every satellite that is not at a lagrange point will see its orbit eventually decay and it will crash back into the earth. Could an ion engine be set to fire at certain times to offset this? Because the rate of decay is slow, an ion engine might be up for it.

also, how does the procedure go for keeping the ISS boosted in orbit? I'd worry about vibration
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
vjk2 said:
Basically, my understanding is that every satellite that is not at a lagrange point will see its orbit eventually decay and it will crash back into the earth.
No. Orbital decay is related to air drag, and does not depend on other planets/moons/sun. It is relevant for low Earth orbits.
Apart from orbital decay, most orbits are stable or nearly stable (i. e. have a timescale of thousands of years or more).
Just two lagrangian points are stable, the other 3 are unstable and need corrections.

Could an ion engine be set to fire at certain times to offset this? Because the rate of decay is slow, an ion engine might be up for it.
It can. Other propulsion systems are easier to build, however, and the total required velocity change over the lifetime of satellites is usually small.

Video of a boost
The acceleration is low, and I don't see significant vibrations.
 
mfb said:
No. Orbital decay is related to air drag, and does not depend on other planets/moons/sun. It is relevant for low Earth orbits.
Apart from orbital decay, most orbits are stable or nearly stable (i. e. have a timescale of thousands of years or more).
Just two lagrangian points are stable, the other 3 are unstable and need corrections.


It can. Other propulsion systems are easier to build, however, and the total required velocity change over the lifetime of satellites is usually small.

Video of a boost
The acceleration is low, and I don't see significant vibrations.

Thanks. Didn't realize how low the ISS orbited.

512px-Comparison_satellite_navigation_orbits.svg.png


I figure that a small ion engine could be run without needing refueling from solar energy.
 
Satellites usually need electric energy anyway - there are some passive reflectors in space, but most satellites are supposed to receive and send data in some way.
And refueling in space is impractical for everything apart from space stations and maybe expensive telescopes.
 
What I'm saying is that a satellite could stay in a lower orbital if it had an ion stabilizer that constantly pushed it up to counteract the effect of air drag.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This hypothesis of scientists about the origin of the mysterious signal WOW seems plausible only on a superficial examination. In fact, such a strong coherent radiation requires a powerful initiating factor, and the hydrogen atoms in the cloud themselves must be in an overexcited state in order to respond instantly. If the density of the initiating radiation is insufficient, then the atoms of the cloud will not receive it at once, some will receive it earlier, and some later. But then there...

Similar threads

Replies
37
Views
6K
Replies
32
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
9K
Back
Top