Could Anti-Matter Be Moving Backwards Through Time?

  • Thread starter Thread starter darkstar05
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Anti-matter Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the idea that antimatter could be the negative solution to the singularity at the universe's beginning, suggesting it might move backwards through time. This concept raises questions about the imbalance between matter and antimatter and whether this balance could change over time. The original poster acknowledges their limited knowledge of physics but expresses curiosity about the implications of their theory. A related thread is mentioned, indicating a connection to broader discussions on the topic. The conversation highlights the intriguing nature of theoretical physics and its complexities.
darkstar05
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi i was just thinking today and don't know enough to be able to rubbish my own theories.

I was thinking about the start of the universe being a singularity, and the plotted curve of 1/x having the 2 solutions , positive and negative infinity at its y axis.
It led me to wonder whether somehow anti matter was the negative solution to the infinity at a singularity as opposed to normal matter being the positive.

And following this i wondered if anti matter was in fact moving backwards through time. Though if it was i suppose we would never encounter it unless the universe was shaped so we did.

Could this in someway account for the imbalance in anti vs normal matter and is there any indication that the balance may change as time moves on?

sorry for the crazy thinking , cheers
 
Space news on Phys.org
thankyou, yes they certainly are it would seem! how interesting, especially as i have studied physics very little. Much of that thread is WAY above my head!
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
9K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Back
Top