Could Antimatter Propulsion Revolutionize Space Travel?

AI Thread Summary
Antimatter propulsion could potentially revolutionize space travel, as the collision of antimatter and matter results in a complete conversion to energy, primarily in the form of photons. However, practical challenges exist, such as the difficulty of producing and storing sufficient antimatter, with current methods yielding negligible amounts. Theoretical discussions suggest that directing the resulting photons using mirrors could facilitate propulsion, but no effective gamma-ray mirrors currently exist. Additionally, while positrons are produced in medical applications, collecting them efficiently for propulsion is impractical due to electrostatic repulsion and storage challenges. Overall, significant technological advancements are needed before antimatter propulsion becomes a viable option for space travel.
kieyard
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
hello everyone, i wasn't sure what category this should go under so General Physics was the safest bet.

to my understanding when antimatter and normal matter collides its a 100% conversion into light, is this correct?

if so, the conservation of mass says all the mass that was originally there is still there but instead of few atoms of antimatter and matter it is now millions upon billions of photons, is that also right?

if so, in the future, near or far i don;t know, could we perhaps have a controlled reaction between the two in a engine of sorts that then directs these photons in a single direction using mirrors to achieve space flight?
using the momentum equation m1v1=m2v2 if we wanted to get one ton to achieve escape velocity (11,000 m/s) we would need 19 grams of antimatter and another 19 grams of matter. because 1000(a ton in kg)*11000(escape velocity)=3*108(speed of light / speed mass will be traveling after reaction)*0.0367(amount of mass needed to balance equation)

there's definitely something I am missing, i know its hard to create and store antimatter and even harder to make something which can do what I am asking but i feel as if i would of heard something somewhere if a project like this was in development, there's got to be a reason why it isn't, any details or information on this would be great, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kieyard said:
to my understanding when antimatter and normal matter collides its a 100% conversion into light, is this correct?
Not necessarily - it depends on the type of matter and the way they meet. Proton/antiproton (or in general hadron/hadron) collisions produce muons and neutrinos as well.
kieyard said:
if so, the conservation of mass says all the mass that was originally there is still there but instead of few atoms of antimatter and matter it is now millions upon billions of photons, is that also right?
That depends on the way you define "mass".
kieyard said:
if so, in the future, near or far i don;t know, could we perhaps have a controlled reaction between the two in a engine of sorts that then directs these photons in a single direction using mirrors to achieve space flight?
There are no proper gamma ray mirrors, but something along this line could be possible, yes.

The amount of antimatter needed depends on the mass of the spacecraft .
kieyard said:
there's definitely something I am missing, i know its hard to create and store antimatter and even harder to make something which can do what I am asking but i feel as if i would of heard something somewhere if a project like this was in development, there's got to be a reason why it isn't, any details or information on this would be great, thanks.
All the antimatter created in the last decades wouldn't lift your rocket even by a centimeter. There is no realistic way to produce or store grams of antimatter in the near future. CERN experiments can store about 10-18 grams of (neutral) antimatter, that is 19 orders of magnitude below your numbers.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
iv read before that anti matter / positrons to be precise are used in medical PET and are produced by radioactive decay. what do you know of this and could we not gather it from this process rather than the LHC at CERN?
 
kieyard said:
iv read before that anti matter / positrons to be precise are used in medical PET and are produced by radioactive decay. what do you know of this and could we not gather it from this process rather than the LHC at CERN?
To expect this to be a practical solution presupposes that a suitable 'bottle' could be made that would use substantially less energy to store this antimatter until it needed to be used, than the energy available from the 'drive'. It would be along the lines of using superconductors for power transmission in the absence of room temperature superconductors.
 
Collecting positrons from radioactive decays would be possible, but even more inefficient than particle accelerator generated antimatter.
Positrons all have a positive charge - as soon as you try to store relevant amounts of them the electrostatic repulsion becomes to strong. To store larger amounts, you would need positrons and antiprotons to form neutral hydrogen. The record is somewhere in the range of 1000 atoms over less than an hour. Far away from practical amounts.

While the LHC produces antiparticles, those are not stored. The antiproton experiments at CERN use the smaller PS and SPS accelerators.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top