Could anyone help me to recognize the Atlas results?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kalok87
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atlas
kalok87
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hallo, Dear particle physicist,

Despite I am major in biophysics, the particle physics looks attractive to me... So I just used Atlantis to check some experiments result from internet... Although I can find some resultant particles. I still cannot understand how to draw a Feynman diagram for them, because I have not learned the mechanism about it.

If it is possible, could you please give me some hints to do it? (In the attachment you can find those visualized data.)

For example, in the first picture (No.2 in the Data): I found there are electrons and muons and hadrons (do not know whether neutron or proton, they are in the same path as muons.), what is the Feynman diagram to describe this process?

Thx.
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, Jedishrfu

If I want to start to draw a diagram in this case (for Atlas, LHC), what should I draw at left hand side? Should I draw P + P \rightarrow ( because it is the collision of 2 protons) or
W \rightarrow and Z \rightarrow ?
 
It is not possible to write the whole interaction with a Feynman graph.
Protons are not elementary particles (they consist of quarks and gluons). In a typical "interesting" collision, one particle ("parton") with significant energy from one proton collides with a parton from the other proton, releasing a lot of energy. The interesting particles (like W and Z bosons, top-quarks, Higgs and whatever) are produced in that interaction, and that can be written with a Feynman graph (example).
Apart from that hard interaction, you always have the rests of the protons hanging around - they can lead to many new gluons and quarks and those produce additional particles quickly afterwards.

Event displays like your images are not a practical method to study particle decays.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top