Could Earth's Early Magnetic Field Have Trapped Hydrogen in the Atmosphere?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the possibility of Earth's early magnetic field being strong enough to trap hydrogen in the atmosphere. It explores the mechanisms by which a magnetic field might interact with hydrogen, particularly in the context of early atmospheric conditions and their implications for abiogenesis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether Earth's early magnetic field could have been strong enough to trap hydrogen within the atmosphere.
  • There is a query about the mechanism by which a magnetic field could trap neutral hydrogen atoms.
  • One participant suggests that hydrogen ions, specifically protons, could be deflected by the magnetic field due to the Lorentz force, potentially leading to collisions with ions in the upper atmosphere that might allow for trapping.
  • Another participant raises the idea that the early atmosphere could have had reducing properties, which are often considered necessary for abiogenesis, but later notes that early mantle convection might provide the necessary redox differences instead.
  • There is a discussion about the balance of hydrogen in the atmosphere, suggesting that while some hydrogen could escape, too much could lead to hydrodynamic escape, affecting the retention of other atmospheric molecules.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the role of Earth's early magnetic field in trapping hydrogen, with some supporting the idea while others question the mechanisms involved. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these interactions for early atmospheric conditions and abiogenesis.

Contextual Notes

The discussion involves assumptions about the strength of the early magnetic field and its interaction with solar wind, as well as the conditions necessary for abiogenesis. There are unresolved questions regarding the specific mechanisms of hydrogen retention and the implications of atmospheric composition on life emergence.

daniel dahl
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
could Earth's early magnetic field have been strong enough to trap hydrogen within the atmosphere?
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
How would a magnetic field trap neutral hydrogen atoms?
 
if they were hydrogen ions emitted as solar wind
 
Hydrogen ions, let's just call them protons, have a charge and a mass. When they encounter a magnetic field they will be deflected onto a different trajectory by a Lorentz_force. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_force
As a proton spirals down the converging magnetic field lines toward a magnetic pole, it may collide with ions in the upper atmosphere and so could be slowed and trapped.There is significant coupling between the solar wind and the Earth's magnetic field.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Elite Jacob
Interesting question, Daniel. Are you wondering if this could have given the early atmosphere reducing properties, a condition often thought necessary for abiogenesis?
 
Ophiolite said:
Interesting question, Daniel. Are you wondering if this could have given the early atmosphere reducing properties, a condition often thought necessary for abiogenesis?

Not any longer, since early mantle convection is now known to give local environments with the necessary redox differences. (Often around hydrothermal vents as they pass the differentiated and serpentinized minerals.) Instead a near neutral atmosphere would be conducive for life emergence, since the CO2 generates a slightly acidic ocean that contrasts to the mantle convection alkaline conditions and makes (local) organic production effective. Such conditions may seem constraining (less global organic production), but in fact increase the likelihood for life elsewhere since especially ice moons with oceans but also early cold, wet bodies like Mars have them.

Perhaps there were a slightly reducing excess due to hydrogen escape from the hot planet (and perhaps remaining and, yes, captured hydrogen). But too much of an excess and the upper atmosphere goes into hydrodynamic escape, hydrogen vents preferably. (But can remove some somewhat more massive molecules with the outflow.) I think the upper limit of hydrogen excess has been limited to 0.5 billion years from such considerations.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
9K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K