Could Ergonomics Boost Gaming Success?

  • Thread starter Thread starter anorlunda
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the impact of ergonomics and environmental factors on gaming performance, specifically in the context of playing "free cell." The user notes a significant improvement in their win streak after switching to playing in a hammock with a tablet, suggesting that the closer screen distance and reduced distractions may enhance their ability to visualize moves and strategize. Other participants contribute insights, mentioning the lack of research on ergonomics in logical games and sharing personal experiences related to gaming setups. One user highlights the importance of personal preferences in gaming performance, particularly in FPS games, while another shares their challenges with visualizing chess moves in different formats. The conversation raises questions about the relationship between physical setup and cognitive performance in gaming.
anorlunda
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Messages
11,326
Reaction score
8,750
This may be a bio question, but I'm not sure so I'm posting it in GD.

For the past 10-15 years, my interest in computer gaming centered on the solitaire game called "free cell". It's a great time waster. I've used several devices over the years. The game tracks my statistics. Once in a while, I peek at my statistics. I have several tens of thousands of games logged, but my success rate has been relatively stable over the years in the range 47% to 53%.

Last week, I won three games in a row so I glanced at the statistics. It said that my record for consecutive wins was 7 and the current win streak was 7. Wow. Since then, I haven't lost a game and my consecutive record now stands at 38. That's far to unlikely to be random chance, so something must be different. But what?

Here's my theory. Last week I played for the first time laying down in a hammock, using a tablet held about 20 cm from my face. I think those ergonomic factors somehow enhanced my ability to visualize several moves in advance and mentally evaluate alternative moves. I use a laptop while sitting and with more distance between screen and eyes. The subtended angle of the playing board is greater when using the tablet as I did.

A second factor is distractions. When I play while sitting I see the whole room. Sometimes, the TV is on while I play. The hammock+tablet setup is closer to a VR experience, because it reduces distractions. But that is also ergonomics.

o_O A third theory is that this change happened at the same time I stopped being a PF mentor. :nb):wink::smile:

What do you say? Might my speculations on ergonomics be valid? Have other people reported more board game success when using VR helmets? What about chess? What other theories should I consider to explain this abrupt change in win statistics?
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Greg Bernhardt and mcastillo356
Physics news on Phys.org
anorlunda said:
A third theory is that this change happened at the same time I stopped being a PF mentor.
:doh:
 
  • Haha
Likes Greg Bernhardt
Could it just be that you figured out how to win the game?
 
If you kill the game with Task Manager, the losses don't get registered. :oldtongue:
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and anorlunda
Are you sure there were no updates/changes to the game code itself?

I am not aware of any research related to the connection between ergonomics and logical games. There is a hard statistical data from Nvidia proving that higher fps (frames per second) leads to more kills in competitive FPS (first person shooter) gaming. It is a common knowledge between gamers that the best DPI (mouse sensitivity) in FPS is a matter of personal preferences and everyone should choose one that they feel most comfortable with. I know from experience that in some kinds of games played vs time smaller screens (larger FOV) lead to better results, but that's just personal anecdata.
 
  • Like
Likes dRic2 and anorlunda
Speaking only for myself when it comes to chess, this is what I've found. With Chessmaster I've always used the 2D layout and these days I can take anyone up to about Elo 1900. Provided I'm looking at a 2D layout. I find that looking at an actual board or 3D depiction nowadays, my ability to see lengthy combinations along multiple lines has deteriorated big time. The only way I can play successfully with a board is by transferring the moves to 2D and looking at that instead.
 
  • Like
Likes anorlunda
Just ONCE, I wanted to see a post titled Status Update that was not a blatant, annoying spam post by a new member. So here it is. Today was a good day here in Northern Wisconsin. Fall colors are here, no mosquitos, no deer flies, and mild temperature, so my morning run was unusually nice. Only two meetings today, and both went well. The deer that was road killed just down the road two weeks ago is now fully decomposed, so no more smell. Somebody has a spike buck skull for their...
Thread 'RIP George F. Smoot III (1945-2025)'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Smoot https://physics.berkeley.edu/people/faculty/george-smoot-iii https://apc.u-paris.fr/fr/memory-george-fitzgerald-smoot-iii https://elements.lbl.gov/news/honoring-the-legacy-of-george-smoot/ https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2006/smoot/facts/ https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200611/nobel.cfm https://inspirehep.net/authors/988263 Structure in the COBE Differential Microwave Radiometer First-Year Maps (Astrophysical Journal...
Back
Top