Could gravitational lensing prove the universe to be older?

AI Thread Summary
Gravitational lensing reveals distant galaxies obscured by closer ones, prompting questions about the universe's age. The current estimate of 13.8 billion years is based on observable limits, specifically the surface of last scattering, which marks the earliest light we can detect. Observations of gravitational lensing do not extend beyond this limit, as electromagnetic radiation from earlier epochs remains trapped in plasma. Consequently, while gravitational lensing provides insights into the universe's structure, it cannot prove that the universe is older than the established age. The constraints of observational astronomy set a definitive boundary on what can be seen and measured.
TerryHM
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
This is only my second post and I am a novice. So please excuse me if this is a naive post.

Gravitational lensing around galaxies shows more distant galaxies hidden behind them. We estimate the universe is 13.8billion years old because that's the limit we can observe into 'the past'.


My question is this.

What if we were to look at the furthest galaxies for gravitational lensing? As the light we are observing has already traveled to the point at which we are observing the lensing effect. Is it not possible to show the universe is in fact older and bigger?

Is this a stupid question or a genuine possibility? Either way, an explanation would be appreciated
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
There is an observational limit to the universe called the surface of last scattering. EM radiation more distant/ancient was trapped in a plasma that occupied the entire observable universe. That plasma persisted until the universe cooled enough to become transparent. We know when that occurred [about 13.7 billion years ago] and will never see anything older than that in the EM spectrum.
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top