Could gravity have 2 components like a photon

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores whether gravity has one or two components, similar to a photon. It notes that linearized gravity can produce a gravitomagnetic field, akin to the magnetic field of a photon, but this theory is limited to weak gravitational fields. In strong fields, like those near neutron stars and black holes, linearized gravity breaks down. Gravity is primarily viewed as having one component, the gravito-electric field, while motion can generate a gravito-magnetic field. Gravitational waves are suggested to have two components, although they are quadrupolar rather than dipolar.
cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3
could gravity have 2 components like a photon , or does gravity just have one component?
Is a gravitational wave a self-sustaining G field .
 
Science news on Phys.org
Yes, linearized gravity gives rise to a gravitomagnetic field, which is like the magnetic field of a photon. So a graviton does have two components like that.

But linearized gravity only works in relatively weak gravitational fields. It breaks down in vicinities of such objects as neutron stars and black holes.
 
cragar said:
could gravity have 2 components like a photon , or does gravity just have one component?
Is a gravitational wave a self-sustaining G field .

That's a good question, Crager.


Gravity itself (say of a non-rotating planet) is considered to have one component and is usually referred to as the the gravito-electric field, which is analogous to a static charged sphere which only consists of an electric (electrostatic) field.

However, (as K^2 mentinioned) according to the linearized field equations matter in motion gives rise to a gravito-magnetic field analogous to a magnetic field resulting from motion of charge. A time rate of change of the gravitoelectric field (gravity) can also give rise to a gravito-magnetic field.

And yes, gravitational "waves" can then be considered to have two components, like EM, albeit, not predicted to be dipolar, but quadrupolar.

Creator
 
Last edited:
interesting thanks for your answers .
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
After my surgery this year, gas remained in my eye for a while. The light air bubbles appeared to sink to the bottom, and I realized that the brain was processing the information to invert the up/down/left/right image transferred to the retina. I have a question about optics and ophthalmology. Does the inversion of the image transferred to the retina depend on the position of the intraocular focal point of the lens of the eye? For example, in people with farsightedness, the focal point is...
Back
Top