Could Halo Nucleons Affect Electron Capture in Nuclear Decay?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Riemannliness
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Halo Nucleons
Riemannliness
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hypothetically, could the process of electron capture in any way be affected by the presence of halo nucleons? There is probably little relation if any, I don't even think that any nuclear of the known halo isotopes can undergo decay under k-capture.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's a gap of many orders of magnitude between the distance scale of the nucleus (1 fm) and the distance scale of the K-shell electrons (.1 nm?). Beta decay is sensitive to nuclear structure, and is the kind of thing that can be calculated using the shell model, but I think it's basically sensitive to things like the overlap between the proton and neutron wavefunctions.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top