Could Heat Exchange Be the Reason Behind Earth's Spin?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JamiePocock
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rotation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the reasons behind Earth's consistent rotation over millions of years, addressing various theories including cosmic particles, collisions, and the Big Bang. A key point raised is the conservation of angular momentum, which implies that without external forces, Earth's spin would remain unchanged. The Moon's gravitational influence is highlighted as a significant factor, as its tidal effects create friction that gradually slows Earth's rotation. Additionally, the initial spin of Earth is attributed to the gravitational pull of material during the solar system's formation, with potential modifications from significant events like the Moon's creation. The conversation concludes by questioning the validity of heat exchange as a mechanism for Earth's rotation, emphasizing the need for mathematical validation of such theories.
JamiePocock
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Question: I read conflicting information on why Earth spins and has done so for millions of years with very little speed change.
Some say it’s due to cosmic spinning particles millions of years ago others say it spins due to collisions in space and some say it remains spinning from the big bag etc.

May be its just my lack of understanding but none of these seem to hold up to me or make much sense.

Could it be the Earth settled in orbit around the sun and then over millions of years began to rotate because the sun heating one surface and the dark side getting colder and colder hence eventually heat diffusing from the hot service and air to the cold service and air mixed with the orbit of the sun caused the Earth to start rotating.

If so at this time it would have spun up quickly in space terms until the temperature of both sides settled down.

Now in this day during the period the earth’s surface is exposed to the suns radiation that surface area (sea or land) and the air above it becomes warmer and warmer until it falls back into darkness (night) and begins to cool, the coldest part that has been in the dark the longest is now being attracted to the warming sun facing surface (morning).

In a vacuum such as space surely this well known heat reaction could over millions of years cause Earth to continue to rotate and remain rotating at its fairly constant speed.
If my theory is correct then someone better at maths than me could proof this by looking at the rotation speed of Earth and calculating the period the suns radiation is on the surface, mass of the Earth and distance from the sun, my maths is not good but I hope you understand what I am saying here.

So if the Earth is in fact rotated by heat diffusing from the hot air to the cold air then this would have a lot of implications such as calculating service temperatures of celestial bodies including the sun and planets, deterring what elements may exists, estimating mass, distance from the sun etc

So could it be rotation has existed for so many years due to the simple physics of heat exchange?

I don't pretend to understand astrophysics, so could someone tell me if this theory is even possible.

Thank you for your time

Jamie Pocock
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
JamiePocock said:
Question: I read conflicting information on why Earth spins and has done so for millions of years with very little speed change.
Some say it’s due to cosmic spinning particles millions of years ago others say it spins due to collisions in space and some say it remains spinning from the big bag etc.
None of the above.

Angular momentum is a conserved quantity. What that means is once something starts spinning, some action, a torque, is required to change that angular momentum. Without any external torques acting on a spinning body, that spinning object would maintain the same angular momentum forever.

That said, the Earth's rotation rate is not constant. The Earth was rotating considerably faster than it is now 4+ billion years ago; some estimate the length of the day was as short as four to six hours. The Moon is the primary culprit. The Moon raises tides in the oceans. Those tides don't flow freely; they interact with the land: Friction.

The friction causes a torque on the Earth, and that torque in turn makes the Earth's rotation rate decrease (rather slowly). There is also an affect on the Moon's orbit. Because the Earth is rotating faster than once per month, the Earth's rotation drags the tidal bulges slightly ahead of the line between the Earth and Moon. This makes the Moon accelerate a bit faster than it would if those tidal bulges were not present, and that in turn makes the Moon slowly recede from the Earth. End result: Angular momentum is being transferred from the Earth's rotation about its axis to the Moon's orbit about the Earth.
 
The initial spin would probably have been from eddies in the clouds of material from which the whole solar system was formed. When you pull in matter (in this case using gravity) from a distance, any slight uneven motions in the initial distribution turn into strong rotation locally, in the same way as water draining from a basin, because angular momentum is conserved, so the rate of rotation increases as the material is pulled in.

The rotation could however have been modified by whatever events created the Moon or other interactions between planets. Although most of the bodies in the solar system are spinning generally in the same direction, some fairly major interactions must have happened at some time to explain the anomalous rotations of Venus and Uranus.
 
Jonathan Scott said:
The rotation could however have been modified by whatever events created the Moon
One of the appeals of the giant impact hypothesis is that it explains the anomalously high angular momentum of the Earth-Moon system.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top