Could medieval swords have had a secret nanotech ingredient?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rach3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nanotechnology
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the intersection of nanotechnology and historical metallurgy, particularly regarding the properties of medieval Damascus blades. A recent study published in Nature reveals that these blades may contain carbon nanotubes and cementite nanowires, contributing to their unique characteristics. Researchers used high-resolution transmission electron microscopy to analyze a seventeenth-century Damascus sabre, discovering that the microstructure includes these nanomaterials, which could explain the blades' distinctive banding patterns. The findings suggest that impurities in iron ores from India may have catalyzed the formation of carbon nanotubes during the blade-making process, although medieval blacksmiths were unaware of the nanoscale structures involved. This research highlights the potential for ancient techniques to incorporate advanced materials science, even without modern technology.
Rach3
In my recent thread, "PF'ers against bad science in journalism", Gokul made a cuutting remark about colloidal silver being labeled a "nanotech" product:

Gokul43201 said:
Hey! I just spent $75 on my last tube of nanotech toothpaste and $155 on my nanoengineered shampoo. Don't go about knocking nanoscience like that! I might take it personally.

I ran into a fascinating follow-up; a recent Nature paper finds that the medieval Damascus blades, whose construction remains a mystery, may owe some of their bizarre properties to carbon nanowires, formed in some unknown metallurgical process! (Disclaimer; the medieval blacksmiths had no clue about the nanoscale structure of their blades, lacking electron microscopes).

Materials: Carbon nanotubes in an ancient Damascus sabre

M. Reibold1,2, P. Paufler1, A. A. Levin1, W. Kochmann1, N. Pätzke1 and D. C. Meyer1

...Here we use high-resolution transmission electron microscopy to examine a sample of Damascus sabre steel from the seventeenth century and find that it contains carbon nanotubes as well as cementite nanowires. This microstructure may offer insight into the beautiful banding pattern of the ultrahigh-carbon steel created from an ancient recipe that was lost long ago.
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v444/n7117/abs/444286a.html

I can't access the full article from my home computer, but a news story describes it to laypersons:

Nature News said:
Sharpest cut from nanotube sword

Carbon nanotech may have given swords of Damascus their edge.

...Materials researcher Peter Paufler and his colleagues at Dresden University, Germany, have taken electron-microscope pictures of the swords and found that wootz has a microstructure of nano-metre-sized tubes, just like carbon nanotubes used in modern technologies for their lightweight strength.

The tubes were only revealed after a piece of sword was dissolved in hydrochloric acid to remove another microstructure in the swords: nanowires of the mineral cementite.

Wootz's ingredients include iron ores from India that contain transition-metal impurities. It was thought that these impurities helped cementite wires to form, but it wasn't clear how. Paufler thinks carbon nanotubes could be the missing piece of the puzzle.

At high temperatures, the impurities in the Indian ores could have catalysed the growth of nanotubes from carbon in the burning wood and leaves used to make the wootz, Paufler suggests. These tubes could then have filled with cementite to produce the wires in the patterned blades, he says...
http://www.nature.com/news/2006/061113/full/061113-11.html

:cool:
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
In my discussions elsewhere, I've noticed a lot of disagreement regarding AI. A question that comes up is, "Is AI hype?" Unfortunately, when this question is asked, the one asking, as far as I can tell, may mean one of three things which can lead to lots of confusion. I'll list them out now for clarity. 1. Can AI do everything a human can do and how close are we to that? 2. Are corporations and governments using the promise of AI to gain more power for themselves? 3. Are AI and transhumans...
Thread 'ChatGPT Examples, Good and Bad'
I've been experimenting with ChatGPT. Some results are good, some very very bad. I think examples can help expose the properties of this AI. Maybe you can post some of your favorite examples and tell us what they reveal about the properties of this AI. (I had problems with copy/paste of text and formatting, so I'm posting my examples as screen shots. That is a promising start. :smile: But then I provided values V=1, R1=1, R2=2, R3=3 and asked for the value of I. At first, it said...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
7K
Back
Top