Could Quantum Mechanics Explain a Super Heavy Universe?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mitcho
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Gerald Schroeder's claim suggests that quantum mechanics could imply a "super heavy" universe, potentially leading to a closed universe scenario. The discussion highlights the Uncertainty Principle's role in allowing fluctuations in spacetime, which could create unstable 'false vacuums' connected via wormholes. If the inflaton field reaches such a state through quantum tunneling, it could trigger inflation in a 'baby universe'. However, the stability of wormholes poses challenges, as they tend to collapse quickly, complicating the formation of new spacetimes. The need for a comprehensive theory of quantum gravity remains critical to understanding these concepts fully.
mitcho
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Watching a video of Gerald Schroeder, I was fascinated by his claim that if the universe were created as a result of our current understanding of quantum mechanics, the universe would be a closed "super heavy" space. The link below goes directly to the point in the video where he says it and it goes until about 7:15. Would I be able to get some learned opinions on this?
Thanks

www.youtube.com/watch?v=yV-LzTO-xdg#t=06m19s
 
Space news on Phys.org


Mitcho,

If by 'data', you mean records of universe popping out of our spacetime, then no, there isn't. But there are pretty strong theoretical reasons to believe it can happen. The idea goes like this:

The Uncertainty Principle allows for fields to fluctuate (keep in mind, however, it's your observations that are actually fluctuating - the field doesn't ever have an actual value, instead, it has an egienstate, but taking different observations on it yields different classical values.) between different classical values. For example, an empty vacuum will have a temperature given by T_{dS}=\frac{H}{2 \pi} \sim 10^{-33} eVIf we treat curved spacetime as a gravitational field, the UP should predict fluctuations in spacetime. This should create 'false vacuums', unstable states that are not at a desirable energy level. They would be connected to the background spacetime via a wormhole. However, they should rapidly collapse. But, Guth and Fahri showed that if the inflaton field (the field that drives inflation) managed, via quantum tunneling, to reach a false vacuum, then inflation could occur in this 'baby universe', allowing it to grow to an enormous size. Since wormholes are incredibly unstable, it would quickly collapse, allowing the baby universe to become its own spacetime.

In the past, it seemed that there was very good reason that this could happen. But, I haven't heard too much about it recently, and Sean Carroll ( A cosmologist whose model relies on this 'baby universe' production) expressed his feelings that he is less certain it can actually happen. We really won't know until a proper theory of quantum gravity is fully developed. Trying to apply quantum mechanics by itself to cosmology may be like trying to apply general relativity to particle physics.

The original paper by Guth and Fahri isn't available on the internet, but here are two I managed to find:

The Universe out of a Monopole in a Laboratory?
http://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0602084v3.pdf

How to Create a Universe
http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/3196/1/Spec.pdf
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top