Could someone explain fire on the atomic level?

relativelyslow
Messages
104
Reaction score
0
could someone explain fire on the atomic level? in six easy pieces it says heat is usually in the form of molecular motion but sometimes it can be so enormous that it generates light. but how? can the motion of these molecules form other types of electromagnetic radiation (secondary question)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, heat is quite often attributed to molecular motion.. but it really makes sense to think about the atomic version of it.. heat in microscopic sense is just the random or chaotic energy which an atom or molecule has.. if this energy is high enough, some of the electrons of the atom jump to higher atomic orbitals and since they r unstable there, they return back to their original orbital by emitting a photon and thereby giving out light..
so, a flame can be , in a sense be attributed to the emission of random thermal energy in the form of photonic energy.. , and when the frequency of the emitted photon is in visible region, we see it as light..

hope it answers ur question..
 
the concept of a photon is confusing to me; ill have to read stuff on it. are molecules always emitting electromagnetic radiation and sometimes the frequencies reach the visible spectrum?
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top