I Could the emission of 2 gravitons in orbits possibly be supressed?

Suekdccia
Messages
352
Reaction score
30
TL;DR
Could the emission of 2 gravitons at the same time in orbits be possibly avoided or supressed?
As bodies orbit each other they emit gravitational waves (presumably by emitting gravitons). There could be configurations of several moons around a planet (for instance) where the quadrupole moment does not change and is invariant. However, there could still be higher order effects, namely two-graviton emission (analogous to "forbidden" electromagnetic transitions that still would happen, albeit with a much smaller probability)

Could the emission of 2 gravitons at the same time be possibly avoided or suppressed? Or perhaps compensated by other mechanism?
 
  • Sad
Likes weirdoguy and Motore
Physics news on Phys.org
Suekdccia said:
TL;DR Summary: Could the emission of 2 gravitons at the same time in orbits be possibly avoided or supressed?

As bodies orbit each other they emit gravitational waves (presumably by emitting gravitons). There could be configurations of several moons around a planet (for instance) where the quadrupole moment does not change and is invariant. However, there could still be higher order effects, namely two-graviton emission (analogous to "forbidden" electromagnetic transitions that still would happen, albeit with a much smaller probability)

Could the emission of 2 gravitons at the same time be possibly avoided or suppressed? Or perhaps compensated by other mechanism?
Under which model? We do not have a valid theory of quantum gravity yet.
 
pines-demon said:
Under which model? We do not have a valid theory of quantum gravity yet.
are there any semi-classical approximations that we can use now (similar to how Hawking radiation is modeled despite not having a quantum theory of gravity)?
 
Suekdccia said:
are there any semi-classical approximations that we can use now (similar to how Hawking radiation is modeled despite not having a quantum theory of gravity)?
No.
 
@Suekdccia you need to do the work yourself of finding out whether there is a model that can be used to answer your question, before asking it. That means taking the time to find specific references as the basis for your question. Given the number of threads you have started without doing this, we are getting to the point where you are going to start getting warnings instead of just reminders about giving a specific reference. Please take heed.

This thread is closed.
 
  • Like
Likes Motore
The annual big string theory conference took place last week. I thought I would make a thread about it, partly because the most prominent post about it anywhere, is probably Peter Woit dismissing it as worthless. I skimmed the live video (links here to slides, videos, and posters). What did I personally find to be of interest? Lara Anderson gave a talk about topology change in heterotic vacua, i.e. transitions between different Calabi-Yau manifolds in the extra dimensions, which turn out...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K