Could There Be a Place in the Universe That's Completely Black?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ValenceE
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the concept of completely black regions in the universe where no light or radiation is detectable. It concludes that, according to current physics, such "empty" spaces do not exist, as electromagnetic radiation permeates all areas of space. Even in isolated environments, like deep caves, particles like neutrinos are constantly present. The idea of a completely empty universe may only be plausible in the far future, but not in the present context. Ultimately, the presence of electromagnetic radiation is a fundamental aspect of the universe's structure.
ValenceE
Messages
142
Reaction score
0
Hello to all !,

given our current physics and cosmology theories and understanding of the universe, could there be an 'open space' location from where we could not see any light, as faint as can be, coming from distant galaxies or light source ?... pitch black all around us...


regards,

VE

Edit: actually, if the answer is yes, than can we expand the 'blackness' to any and all currently measurable radiation ?
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
Short answer - no. As long as there are no obstacles to light or radiation, it will continue to travel. For example, the cmb can be detected in all directions.
 
Thank's for the reply,

so then, am I right in stating that, given what we presently know, we can safely say that empty space does not exist ?


VE
 
ValenceE said:
Thank's for the reply,

so then, am I right in stating that, given what we presently know, we can safely say that empty space does not exist ?


VE
Space that is "empty" of EM radiation cannot exist within our understanding of the universe. There will always be EM suffusing it, no matter where you are. Even if you dug a deep cave in the Earth and hid in that, particles (neutrinos) would be zipping through you day and night. No place to hide.
 
Certainly not now. Evolve the universe forward some 10^100 years or so, and it will be effectively completely empty (note: the actual timeframe depends upon the exact nature of physics which we don't yet understand, but the fact that it will happen we can be reasonably confident about). See here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Future_of_an_expanding_universe
 
Is this true? Doesn't there have to be a temperature difference as well as existence of radiation? If I, my instruments are at the same temperature as some other place there is no energy exchange between us, I can receive no signals or information from it even though there still is EM radiation? Nor send any. If there are places not like that, I could notice its presence by its absence IYKWIM. Sounds crazy at first, but doesn't every info we get depend on on a temperature difference? - a star or tungsten filament emits radiation which, maybe after reflection reaches us.
 
Last edited:
epenguin said:
Is this true? Doesn't there have to be a temperature difference as will as existence of radiation? If I, my instruments are at the same temperature as some other place there is no energy exchange between us, I can receive no signals or information from it even though there still is EM radiation? Nor send any. If there are places not like that, I could notice its presence by its absence IYKWIM. Sounds crazy at first, but doesn't every info we get depend on on a temperature difference? - a star or tungsten filament emits radiation which, maybe after reflection reaches us.
Right, which is why there won't be any regions in the universe that are entirely empty until the universe itself is.
 
Back
Top