Coulomb Potential Energy - discrepancy between like and opposite charges

AI Thread Summary
The Coulomb potential energy for like charges is positive, while for opposite charges, it is negative, leading to a discrepancy in their values despite equal force magnitudes. This difference raises the question of why the potential energies are not equal, as both scenarios involve forces acting in opposite directions. The discussion draws an analogy to a mechanical spring, where potential energy is equal on either side of the equilibrium position, contrasting with the Coulomb case. The key takeaway is that the actual value of potential energy is less significant than its derivative concerning position, which shows opposite behaviors for like and opposite charges. Understanding this relationship clarifies the apparent discrepancy in potential energy between like and opposite charges.
aalnaif
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
The Coulomb potential energy between two point charges is defined as:

V=[(q_1)(q_2)]/[(k*r)]

Suppose that you have two equal, like charges at a distance L, then V_like=q2/(k*L)

Similarly, for two equal, opposite charges, V_opp=-q2/(k*L)=-V_like

Both situations experience a force of equal magnitude (just opposite directions), yet V_opp<V_like? Shouldn't the two potential energies be equal?

By analogy with a mechanical spring, a weight that is left of the equilibrium position experiences a force of equal magnitude but opposite direction to a weight on the right of the equilibrium position. This is similar to the potential energy above. However, in this case, V_left=V_right, since the spring potential energy is:

V = 0.5kx2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Force is actually related to the derivative of the potential energy. The actual value of the potential energy doesn't matter at all. If you take the derivative of V with respect to position, you'll see that for like charges, it is the opposite of the derivative for unlike charges. Same with the mechanical spring: the derivative of V is the opposite for the mass on the left as for the mass on the right.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top