Coulombs law, initial speed to collide with other nucleus

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the initial speed required for a helium nucleus to collide with a fixed gold nucleus, utilizing concepts from electrostatics and kinetic energy. The context includes the properties of the nuclei, such as their charges and radii.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of potential energy and its relation to kinetic energy, questioning the values used for mass and their impact on the final speed calculation.

Discussion Status

Some participants have confirmed the calculations and noted discrepancies in mass values that could explain differences in results. There is an ongoing exploration of the assumptions regarding the mass of the helium nucleus.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under a time constraint, as the problem is due the next day. There is mention of a potential error in the mass value used by the teacher, which is being investigated further.

skate_nerd
Messages
174
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A helium nucleus has radius rHe = 1.9 fm, mass m = 6.6 × 10-27 kg, and charge +2e. A gold nucleus has charge +87e and radius rAu = 7.0 fm. What initial speed must a helium nucleus have if it is to come into contact with a fixed gold nucleus in a head on collision?

Homework Equations



U=k(q1q2)/(r1+r2)
U=(mv2)/2

The Attempt at a Solution



started by solving for potential energy by making U=k(q1q2/(r1+r2)) so i got U=4.51(10-12) J.
Now setting this equal to (mv2)/2, i got
v=√(2U/m)=
and this came out as 3.697(107) m/s.
The teacher's answer is 1.17(106) m/s.
Could somebody help me find where i went wrong? this is due tomorrow i would be very grateful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your solution looks correct to me. The ratio of your answer to your teacher's answer is close to √1000. The mass of an alpha particle in grams is 6.6 x 10-24 g. I wonder if your teacher used a mass of 6.6 x 10-24 kg rather than 6.6 x 10-27 kg. That would account for the difference.
 
Last edited:
Hm, that's interesting. I plugged in the 6.6(10-24) and got the answer the teacher provided. Thanks for noticing that. I guess I'll email him now...
 
I've got the same answer as yours
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
15K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K