Coulomb's law with more point charges than one

AI Thread Summary
In a scenario with multiple point charges, the force on a specific charge can be calculated by using the principle of superposition, which allows for the addition of individual forces acting on that charge. The interaction between other charges does not affect the calculation for the force on the target charge, as only the forces directly acting on it are considered. It is assumed that the positions of the charges remain fixed unless specified otherwise, simplifying the analysis. The forces between other charges, such as those between particles 2 and 3, do not influence the force experienced by particle 1. Understanding this principle is crucial for simplifying calculations in electrostatics.
Lindsayyyy
Messages
215
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I got a little question. Let's say we have 3 point charges on a line, for example on the x axis.

1----2----3

something like this. If I want to calculate the Force on point charge one, why am I allowed to just add the forces 12 and 13. I saw it in a book and was confused. Why don't I have to consider the interaction between the particel 2 and 3?

Thanks for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lindsayyyy said:
Why don't I have to consider the interaction between the particel 2 and 3?
Why would the force that particles 2 and 3 exert on each other matter to particle 1? All you care about are the forces on particle 1.
 
if

1: -
2: -
3: +

I thought that 2 and 3 attract each other and the distance between 1 and 2 increases, because 1 and 2 repel aswell. Further distance -> force decreased. Or do I have to handle the charges like they are on a constant place? That's what I was wondering about.
 
You'll usually be given the locations of the charges. Assume they are fixed in place unless told otherwise. In any case, you are probably asked to find the force on particle 1 when the charges are in the locations given. If later they move, who cares? That's a different problem.
 
It's called superposition and its a wonderful thing as it makes calculation so much easier that can be applied in many aspects of physics.

Basically superposition says that each effect taken separately can simply be added togerther.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_principle
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Back
Top