Counter intuitive melting temperatures

  • Thread starter Thread starter JizzaDaMan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Counter Melting
AI Thread Summary
The melting point of helium is indeed lower than that of hydrogen, with helium melting at 1.1K and hydrogen at 14.175K. This counterintuitive phenomenon is attributed to the nature of molecular interactions and binding energies, where helium's tightly bound electron clouds result in weaker London forces compared to hydrogen's more polarizable electron clouds. Additionally, the zero point movements of nuclei in these atoms affect bond strength, with lighter hydrogen experiencing greater amplitude of movement, weakening its bonds more than those of helium. The discussion also touches on the systematic trends of boiling points versus melting points, noting that boiling points are less influenced by crystal structure. Understanding these concepts clarifies the reasons behind the melting temperature discrepancies between these two gases.
JizzaDaMan
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
I have heard that the melting/freezing point of helium is lower than that of hydrogen. Is this correct? if so why?

My thoughts on this are that hydrogen has the lowest mass and therefore requires less energy than helium to be in a liquid or gaseous state, so it appears counter intuitive that the melting point of helium is lower than that of hydrogen.
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
the melting point of helium is 1.1K,or -272.05°C,or-458°F the melting point of hydrogen is 14.175K,or-258.975°C,or-434°F the reasn for this i don't know but i hope this helps
 
JizzaDaMan said:
I have heard that the melting/freezing point of helium is lower than that of hydrogen. Is this correct? if so why?

My thoughts on this are that hydrogen has the lowest mass and therefore requires less energy than helium to be in a liquid or gaseous state, so it appears counter intuitive that the melting point of helium is lower than that of hydrogen.

Melting point of nitrogen is also lower than that of carbon.

The thermal movement of molecules is not working agains mass. True, heavier molecules move slower; but they also have more inertia. The main effect is that the thermal movement works against binding energy. Carbon atoms in graphite are bound by strong covalent bonds and extreme heat is needed to break them; strong covalent bonds also bond two nitrogen atoms to a molecule, but the bonds between nitrogen molecules are feeble London forces.

The London forces which bind to each other molecules of nitrogen, or paraffin, or hydrogen, or atoms of helium or neon, are forces which only connect electron clouds. It is only some higher order effects which depend on mass of the nuclei inside the clouds.

Helium, being an inert gas, has very small, tightly bound electron clouds. They are very hard to polarize and thus have weak London forces, compared to the bigger, looser and more polarizable electron clouds of hydrogen molecules.

The higher order effects come from zero point movements of the nuclei inside. Just like electrons cannot fall onto nuclei but have to undergo orbital movements and spread out as electron clouds, nuclei cannot occupy a single position in a molecule or crystal. Both hydrogen and deuterium atoms need some space to move around in crystal - but since the electrons follow the nuclei in zero point movements, this weakens the bonds which the electrons make. And weakens them more for protium than for deuterium, whose nuclei are more massive and have lower amplitude of zero point motion.

Also, boiling points generally have more regular systematic trends than melting points, because they are not so dependent on specifics of crystal structure.
 
Thanks snorkack, most of that makes sense to me, just this paragraph that confused me a little:

The higher order effects come from zero point movements of the nuclei inside. Just like electrons cannot fall onto nuclei but have to undergo orbital movements and spread out as electron clouds, nuclei cannot occupy a single position in a molecule or crystal. Both hydrogen and deuterium atoms need some space to move around in crystal - but since the electrons follow the nuclei in zero point movements, this weakens the bonds which the electrons make. And weakens them more for protium than for deuterium, whose nuclei are more massive and have lower amplitude of zero point motion.

What do you mean by zero point movements?
 
JizzaDaMan said:
Thanks snorkack, most of that makes sense to me, just this paragraph that confused me a little:



What do you mean by zero point movements?

I think I explained it. Oscillations around the potential minimum position.
 
You might have done but it wasn't fully clear to me :P thanks alot, that's much clearer to me
 
I need to calculate the amount of water condensed from a DX cooling coil per hour given the size of the expansion coil (the total condensing surface area), the incoming air temperature, the amount of air flow from the fan, the BTU capacity of the compressor and the incoming air humidity. There are lots of condenser calculators around but they all need the air flow and incoming and outgoing humidity and then give a total volume of condensed water but I need more than that. The size of the...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...
Back
Top