I Counting Total Spin for N Two-Level Systems (TLS)

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Haris
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spin Spin 1/2
Haris
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
I am having considerable trouble understanding the addition of spins. The context in which I am studying this is the Tavis-Cummings Model.
Statement:
"Assume that r and m mean total spin and projection of spin along z, respectively. For N-TLS the total spin (r) can assume N+1 to 1/2 or 0 spin depending on N being even or odd. For a fixed r the value of m varies from +j to -j in integer steps. R is the operator whose eigen-values are r. The basis choice is |r,m>."
Now then, if I intend to make a matrix pretaining to single transitions of the composite system, i align the states with fixed r. For fixed r I have 2m+1 states. When r=N/2 my states are N+1 as simple substitution verifies. However, when r=N/2 -1 the number of states are (N-1)^2. It gets weirder for N/2 -2

Questions:
1) Why is r =N/2 -1 valid as individual spin is half not 1.
2) The counting on main diagonals are pretty confusing. For each irrep of SU(2) there's 2m+1 states and that's fine. But the multiplicity of each state is entirely vague to me.

I have linked the original paper and the figure 1 is where the counting is shown.

1730022772893.png
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Correction: its 2r+1 instead of 2m+1
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
61
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
2K
Back
Top