vela said:
A subset of A doesn't have to have fewer elements than A. The set A is a subset of itself.
What's called a proper subset of A does have to contain fewer elements than A.
Thank You, vela.
Here's yet another attempt to differentiate between 'element of' and 'subset of' (also, by subset I'll mean proper subset)
Say, I got the following relations below and asked to see which ones are true, which ones- false:
2 ∈ {1,2,3}
{2} ∈ {1,2,3}
{2} ∈ {{1}, {2}}
Anything to the left of ∈ is an object. All I care about is if that object can be found in the set on the right side of ∈ in exactly the same form it's on the left side i. e.
2 ∈ {1,2,3} is true because the object- number 2- can be found in the set {1,2,3}
{2} ∈ {1,2,3} is false because there's no object- a set containing number 2- in the set {1,2,3}
{2} ∈ {{1}, {2}} is true because an object- a set containing number 2- is also in {{1}, {2}}
Also, say, I have these below and need to know if any of them are true:
2 ⊆ {1,2,3}
{2} ⊆ {1,2,3}
{2} ⊆ {{1}}, {2}}
The statements above, sort of, implicitly imply (to me) comparison between sets. Here we are concerned if all the elements in the subset are also in the superset i. e.
2 ⊆ {1,2,3} is false because the number two is not even a set to begin with.
{2} ⊆ {1,2,3} is true because the number 2 in the set {2} also happens in the set {1,2,3}
{2} ⊆ {{1}}, {2}} is false because the set {{1}}, {2}} does not contain the number 2
Am I looking at this right?
I am just paranoid something might slip by me unnoticed hence this (redundant) dissection.