I Can You Help Me Couple 3 Spin 1/2 Particles?

JoJoQuinoa
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm trying to couple 3 spin 1/2 particles. So far, I have been able to find the coefficient for the other states but I can't get the results for ##j_{12} = 0## to ##j_3=1/2##.
Here is my attempt:
1) Using CG table ##<j_1;j_2;m_1;m_2|J;M><\frac{1}{2};\frac{1}{2};-\frac{1}{2};\frac{1}{2}|0;0> = 1/\sqrt2##
2) Using CG table again with ##\frac{1}{\sqrt2}<0;\frac{1}{2};0;\frac{1}{2}|\frac{1}{2};\frac{1}{2}> = 1/\sqrt2*1/\sqrt3 = 1/\sqrt6##

The correct answer is ##1/\sqrt2##.

Please help!

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your second C-G is wrong. Adding L=0 to anything has C-G=1.
 
Meir Achuz said:
Your second C-G is wrong. Adding L=0 to anything has C-G=1.
Hi Meir Achuz,

Thank you for your reply. Do you mind explaining a little bit in details or direct me to where I can find more info on that? The sources I've looked at only listed the results so I guess this is supposed to be known? I'm using Quantum Mechanics by David H. McIntyre.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
504
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top