Covariant differentiation commutes with contraction?

AI Thread Summary
Covariant differentiation is discussed in relation to its commutation with contraction in tensor analysis. The main focus is on the expression \nabla_{i}T^{jk}_{kl} and the two interpretations of applying covariant differentiation. The discussion emphasizes the importance of proving that both interpretations yield the same result. Participants suggest explicitly writing out the delta tensor involved in contractions and applying the product rule. The conversation highlights the need for a deeper understanding of the properties of covariant derivatives and delta tensors in this context.
kiddokiddo
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I've been reading a textbook on tensor analysis for a while. The book uses the conclusion of "covariant differentiation commutes with contraction" directly and I searched around and found most people just use the conclusion without proof.

Homework Equations


For example, \nabla_{i}T^{jk}_{kl}.

The Attempt at a Solution


I believe it can be interpreted in two ways. First, form the variant T^{jk}_{kl} with two free indices j, l and apply \nabla_{i} to that tensor; Or, apply \nabla_{i} to the tensor T^{jk}_{ml} and contract m and k. If the two interpretations lead to the same result, it should then be proved.

Any help is appreciated!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Whenever you contract something, there's a delta tensor involved. Try writing that out explicitly and using the product rule. What do you know about \nabla^i \delta_k^m?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top