COVID COVID-19 Coronavirus Containment Efforts

Click For Summary
Containment efforts for the COVID-19 Coronavirus are facing significant challenges, with experts suggesting that it may no longer be feasible to prevent its global spread. The virus has a mortality rate of approximately 2-3%, which could lead to a substantial increase in deaths if it becomes as widespread as the flu. Current data indicates around 6,000 cases, with low mortality rates in areas with good healthcare. Vaccine development is underway, but it is unlikely to be ready in time for the current outbreak, highlighting the urgency of the situation. As the outbreak evolves, the healthcare system may face considerable strain, underscoring the need for continued monitoring and response efforts.
  • #1,111
DennisN said:
Science to the rescue: A Faraday cage for those members would prevent them from being hit by lighning. :cool:

I told one of them. He answered that earthly things won't protect them because it's not a normal lightning but one that comes from someplace similar to Asgard.

Speaking of lightning. Can even a small Faraday cage protects one from very powerful lightning? Is there a camping tent made of Faraday cage fabric?

In the lockdown. Some would be so bored at home, they may put tent in the rooftop and enjoy the sky.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #1,112
chirhone said:
I told one of them. He answered that earthly things won't protect them because it's not a normal lightning but one that comes from someplace similar to Asgard.
Ah, I see. Well those are more difficult to convince. Maybe you could show him this music video instead, which demonstrates exactly that kind of lightning:

WKUK God Wants You To Wear A Hat
 
  • #1,113
We have 11 deaths now. Many have cardiovascular diseases. But one is 40 yrs old and no signs of it.

Is there a list of summary of all deceased worldwide? I'd like to know if most of them are weak or immunocomprised. How many of them are so strong and optimal health?

I wonder if the virus is seeking some factors in the body that can kill them faster.
 
  • #1,114
chirhone said:
We have 11 deaths now. Many have cardiovascular diseases. But one is 40 yrs old and no signs of it.

Is there a list of summary of all deceased worldwide? I'd like to know if most of them are weak or immunocomprised. How many of them are so strong and optimal health?

I wonder if the virus is seeking some factors in the body that can kill them faster.
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/coronavirus-age-sex-demographics/
 
  • #1,115
chirhone said:
When you sneeze or cough. How long is the distance it can travel? We are trying to maintain one meter "social distancing" Is it enough?

Here some churches can't be closed during lockdown because of some members fears that they can be hit by lightning from above if they will not attend one.

View attachment 258713

Hmmm, in many places the suggested distance is greater than 1m, it should be around 2m or 6ft.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prepare/transmission.html

But even with that, it is more important than that is that those with symptoms (even very mild ones) should self-isolate and not attend church.

In Singapore, the Archbishop of the Catholic Church has canceled all masses. He momentarily lifted the suspension, but reinstated it (because of the pandemic declaration) before any masses had taken place. I think @kadiot praised this decision earlier in the thread, and I too think it is a good and exemplary one.
 
  • Like
Likes kadiot
  • #1,116
chirhone said:
We have 11 deaths now. Many have cardiovascular diseases. But one is 40 yrs old and no signs of it.

Is there a list of summary of all deceased worldwide? I'd like to know if most of them are weak or immunocomprised. How many of them are so strong and optimal health?

I wonder if the virus is seeking some factors in the body that can kill them faster.

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/03/13/world/asia/coronavirus-death-life.html
 
  • #1,117
@bhobba , @Evo , @phinds , @russ_watters :

I recently took an inventory of my number of toilet paper rolls in my home.
It is getting critically low.
I've only got 500 rolls left.
Could you please perhaps sell me some?
I need about 500 more.
I can pay you via paypal.
:oldbiggrin:
 
  • #1,118
mfb said:
There is a reason the tests are routinely done twice.

My understanding is that a test gets an incorrect result because of the patient, not because of the test. A false negative (more common) because the body just doesn't have enough right-sized virus fragments.
 
  • #1,119
DennisN said:
Science to the rescue: A Faraday cage for those members would prevent them from being hit by lighning. :cool:
A Far a day keeps the mortuary away* . Or something like that.

*As in 'An apple a day...'.
 
  • Haha
Likes DennisN
  • #1,120
Georgia Democratic primary cancelled.

Big question is how the general election will play out if COVID19 still lingers in November. That could be a super spreader event nationwide.

Have heard warm weather and higher humidity MIGHT be something that wipes out the virus, as it cannot survive as well. Maybe growth and carrier rates decline in the summer. But, what about November?

Can elections even take place? They are massively cramped events, so social spacing/distancing is very hard.
 
  • #1,121
kyphysics said:
Georgia Democratic primary cancelled.

Big question is how the general election will play out if COVID19 still lingers in November. That could be a super spreader event nationwide.

Have heard warm weather and higher humidity MIGHT be something that wipes out the virus, as it cannot survive as well. Maybe growth and carrier rates decline in the summer. But, what about November?

Can elections even take place? They are massively cramped events, so social spacing/distancing is very hard.
Is it at all possible for the election to take place electronically? I suppose it needs a nation wide identification system, not sure how that can work in the US though?
 
  • #1,122
wukunlin said:
If you are going to a Church, wear a face mask.
If one goes out in public, one may wish to wear a mask, because one does not know who one may encounter. Also, carry some disposable wipes with which to wipe hands that have touched high-touch surfaces. At my place of employment, sanitary practices were ramped up (increased cleaning of door handles and door knobs, and high-touch surfaces) four weeks ago in anticipation of the spread of 2019-nCoV. Hand sanitizer dispensers were placed near all building entrances.

Three weeks ago, we began doing meetings by video-conference, which has been an option for a number of years.
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN and wukunlin
  • #1,123
Everyone should have some hand sanitizer, but hoarders who deprive others should read this:

The week that changed lives: For one Garner family, sanitizer shortage puts a life at risk
https://www.newsobserver.com/news/local/article241193256.html
“Ma’am we don’t have any,” the pharmacist on the other end of the line replied, “and I don’t think we’ll have any for a month.”

Bethany and Jared Reeves’ 3-year-old daughter, Naomi, received a heart transplant when she was four months old. Naomi’s immune system is suppressed to keep her body from rejecting the heart, leaving her highly susceptible to colds, the flu and COVID-19, the illness caused by the new coronavirus. They need the hand sanitizer so they and their older daughter, Kathryn, can protect Naomi.

The product is important enough to Naomi’s heath that the Reeveses installed a dispenser just inside the family’s front door; visitors must use it before entering the two-story home. So when Bethany learned the sanitizer would be missing from their local pharmacy for at least a month, the hunt was on.

If you have a few months' supply - great. If you have 10 years worth and people like this cannot access any, then in emergencies like COVID19, that is practically criminal.
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN
  • #1,124
EU decision (approved by Council because Commission cannot do anything without the approval of the Council members in concensus, Italy naturally included) through EU Commission which is the executive arm of the Council (issued two days ago):

COVID-19: Commission sets out European coordinated response to counter the economic impact of the Coronavirus*

.../...The Commission will use all the instruments at its disposal to mitigate the consequences of the pandemic, in particular:

- To ensure the necessary supplies to our health systems by preserving the integrity of the Single Market and of production and distribution of value chains;

- To support people so that income and jobs are not affected disproportionally and to avoid permanent effect of this crisis;

- To support firms and ensure that the liquidity of our financial sector can continue to support the economy

- And to allow Member States to act decisively in a coordinated way, through using the full flexibility of our State Aid and Stability and Growth Pact Frameworks.

https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_20_459
 
  • #1,125
kyphysics said:
Everyone should have some hand sanitizer, but hoarders who deprive others should read this:

The week that changed lives: For one Garner family, sanitizer shortage puts a life at risk
https://www.newsobserver.com/news/local/article241193256.html
If you have a few months' supply - great. If you have 10 years worth and people like this cannot access any, then in emergencies like COVID19, that is practically criminal.
That is absolutely heartbreaking. :cry:

I will try to find the email to the journalist who wrote the article to get the contact info to the family.
If I succeed I will try to locate hand sanitization and send it to them. But it would take some time for a delivery from Sweden to the US, so if anyone here reading this is in the US and have access to available hand sanitization it would go much faster.

Anyone, anyone, Bueller?

Maybe we could ask @Greg Bernhardt for advice regarding this too, that is, maybe ask members how to locate available hand sanitization, perhaps?

EDIT:

I have found the email to the reporter and I have just sent an email to him.
 
Last edited:
  • #1,126
kyphysics said:
Georgia Democratic primary cancelled.

Big question is how the general election will play out if COVID19 still lingers in November. That could be a super spreader event nationwide.

Have heard warm weather and higher humidity MIGHT be something that wipes out the virus, as it cannot survive as well. Maybe growth and carrier rates decline in the summer. But, what about November?

Can elections even take place? They are massively cramped events, so social spacing/distancing is very hard.

The Georgia primary was not cancelled, it was postponed to May 19: https://apnews.com/2ec895cc5ec27745f9a1b33c091be7ca

Georgia is the second state to postpone primary elections due to concerns over the virus, joining Louisiana.

Please be more careful about the facts that you report. A claim like this should include a link to a reputable news site.

Meanwhile, my home state, Illinois, is proceeding with our March 17 primary despite volunteer poll workers canceling and polling locations backing out: https://chicago.suntimes.com/politi...-county-polling-places-unprecedented-election

Luckily, suspecting things could get bad by March 17, I requested a mail in ballot a week ago, so that I can avoid having to go to a polling place.

Various states have expanded vote by mail efforts, and some states conduct their elections entirely by mail (IIRC, Oregon does this). Some states are considering conducting their primaries by mail (https://www.baltimoresun.com/corona...0200313-asebi2ahqfab7a7yxhnoayy22a-story.html), and mail in ballots could presumably be a good option in November if necessary (though if Coronavirus is still a big issue by then, perhaps we have bigger worries).
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes russ_watters and phinds
  • #1,127
anorlunda said:
The tests are designed to protect the public, not you.
I agree. We have been abiding by the World Health Organization's(WHO) directives regarding the management of the Covid 19 breakout. Screening, reporting, contact tracing are some of the recommendations. Testing was (and still is) a problem because of limited resources. This is a new disease that requires special testing. This caught the entire world flat footed. No one was prepared for this need. WHO did not advise outright travel bans. We did anyway, as some other countries where the number of morbidity and mortality is nevertheless staggering.
 
  • #1,128
Ygggdrasil said:
Please be more careful about the facts that you report. A claim like this should include a link to a reputable news site.

I agree.

And @kyphysics , you might want to take it down a notch about telling others what to do, given that you've told us you think you have it, and then zipped out to shop and refuse to see a doctor. Glass houses, stones, you know the drill.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes russ_watters, StoneTemplePython and phinds
  • #1,129
Vanadium 50 said:
My understanding is that a test gets an incorrect result because of the patient, not because of the test. A false negative (more common) because the body just doesn't have enough right-sized virus fragments.

Do you have a source for this? I've done RT-qPCR tests in a research setting (though not in any diagnostic capacity), and false positives/negatives due to issues with the sample (not the patient) seem more common (e.g. taking more sample from the patient can resolve issues with inconsistent tests).

It's certainly possible that patient-specific false negatives could arise due to mutations in the virus that render it undetectable by current tests (which probe for specific RNA sequences within the viral genome), but it seems like these are likely rare events (the mutation rate of coronaviruses seems fairly low and the sequences chosen as targets for the tests are in highly evolutionarily conserved regions of the virus that should not mutate frequently).
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Astronuc and mfb
  • #1,130
DennisN said:
That is absolutely heartbreaking. :cry:

I will try to find the email to the journalist who wrote the article to get the contact info to the family.
If I succeed I will try to locate hand sanitization and send it to them. But it would take some time for a delivery from Sweden to the US, so if anyone here reading this is in the US and have access to available hand sanitization it would go much faster.

Anyone, anyone, Bueller?

Maybe we could ask @Greg Bernhardt for advice regarding this too, that is, maybe ask members how to locate available hand sanitization, perhaps?
They don't seem to have left a contact.
 
  • #1,131
WWGD said:
They don't seem to have left a contact.
I have found the email address to the reporter via my google-fu, and I sent an email to him about a minute ago. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes WWGD
  • #1,132
DennisN said:
I have found the email address to the reporter via my google-fu, and I sent an email to him about a minute ago. :smile:
Ok, please post if you get it. Good job.
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN
  • #1,133
Ygggdrasil said:
Do you have a source for this?

My doc. He also said, and this seems sensible to me, that the higher the accuracy level, the more that false positives/negatives depend on the patient over the sample.
 
  • #1,134
WWGD said:
Ok, please post if you get it. Good job.
Thanks! Will do. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes WWGD
  • #1,135
Ygggdrasil said:
Do you have a source for this? I've done RT-qPCR tests in a research setting (though not in any diagnostic capacity), and false positives/negatives due to issues with the sample (not the patient) seem more common (e.g. taking more sample from the patient can resolve issues with inconsistent tests).

It's certainly possible that patient-specific false negatives could arise due to mutations in the virus that render it undetectable by current tests (which probe for specific RNA sequences within the viral genome), but it seems like these are likely rare events (the mutation rate of coronaviruses seems fairly low and the sequences chosen as targets for the tests are in highly evolutionarily conserved regions of the virus that should not mutate frequently).

Vanadium 50 said:
My doc. He also said, and this seems sensible to me, that the higher the accuracy level, the more that false positives/negatives depend on the patient over the sample.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2762688

Take a look at Figure 2 in the above article, a quick glance at the PCR Ct values seems to support @Ygggdrasil's guess - in a given patient one can have ND (non-detectable) values even with previous and subsequent days above detectability.

BTW, I don't think the statement from @Vanadium 50's doc can be generally right, because if a full sequence is done, I would expect essentially 100% accuracy with no false negatives for any patient (but with false negative for particular samples from a patient). The only thing is of course that a full sequence is not a sort of test you run on massive numbers of people (@Ygggdrasil please correct if wrong)
 
  • #1,136
atyy said:
because if a full sequence is done

I've never sequenced DNA myself, but I believer you are correct that a full sequence is not a sort of test you run on massive numbers of people. While the JAMA article was interesting, I'm not sure how it connects to false negatives or positives.
 
  • #1,137
wukunlin said:
Is it at all possible for the election to take place electronically? I suppose it needs a nation wide identification system, not sure how that can work in the US though?
In my state (Oregon), we vote entirely by mail.
 
  • Like
Likes wukunlin and BillTre
  • #1,138
Vanadium 50 said:
I've never sequenced DNA myself, but I believer you are correct that a full sequence is not a sort of test you run on massive numbers of people. While the JAMA article was interesting, I'm not sure how it connects to false negatives or positives.

My guess is that an ND on one day where the previous and subsequent days are positive would be a false negative sample in a positive patient.
 
  • #1,139
A John Hopkins doctor say there might be up to 500,000 infected in the USA.No this can't be true.
This is the news article https://news.yahoo.com/marty-makary-on-coronavirus-in-the-us-183558545.html. The doctor name is Makaray here is website https://www.jhsph.edu/faculty/directory/profile/1565/martin-a-makary

According to Makary this is going to the worst public health crisis since polio. People need to take this virus seriously.
 
  • #1,140
No no no we are running out of toilet paper where I live this virus is terrible.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
9K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 516 ·
18
Replies
516
Views
36K
Replies
0
Views
560
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K