homeylova223
- 104
- 22
According to
homeylova223 said:A John Hopkins doctor say there might be up to 500,000 infected in the USA.No this can't be true.
This is the news article https://news.yahoo.com/marty-makary-on-coronavirus-in-the-us-183558545.html. The doctor name is Makaray here is website https://www.jhsph.edu/faculty/directory/profile/1565/martin-a-makary
Since I am wannabe internet spy*, I have managed to find the home address of the family anyway.WWGD said:Ok, please post if you get it. Good job.
Astronuc said:If one goes out in public, one may wish to wear a mask, because one does not know who one may encounter.
Why is the word "practically" in that sentence?kyphysics said:If you have a few months' supply - great. If you have 10 years worth and people like this cannot access any, then in emergencies like COVID19, that is practically criminal.
DennisN said:Maybe we could ask @Greg Bernhardt for advice regarding this too, that is, maybe ask members how to locate available hand sanitization, perhaps?
Ygggdrasil said:Georgia is the second state to postpone primary elections due to concerns over the virus, joining Louisiana.
I can assure you I will give the mother advice regarding safety learned from WHO and this thread when I get in contact with her.bhobba said:Just use soap. I don't get this hand sanitizer thing. Yes you can have it on your desk and its convenient from that point of view - but its just convenience - not a necessity.
atyy said:Doesn't one just self-isolate until one is no longer symptomatic, maybe a day extra if one wants to be cautious?
The transmission of COVID-19 from asymptomatic individuals is generally thought to be negligible.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/...Djw5x0wmu9XZaooHRlZmqQq8PBtm2UJ4mWzQ80sJa_JxURecent evidence suggests that even someone who is non-symptomatic can spread COVID-19 with high efficiency, and conventional measures of protection, such as face masks, provide insufficient protection.
https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciaa201/5766416A well 6-month-old infant with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) had persistently positive nasopharyngeal swabs to day 16 of admission. This case highlights the difficulties in establishing the true incidence of COVID-19 as asymptomatic individuals can excrete the virus. These patients may play important roles in human-to-human transmission in the community.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/14/health/coronavirus-asymptomatic-spread/index.html"Asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic transmission are a major factor in transmission for Covid-19," said Dr. William Schaffner, a professor at Vanderbilt University School of Medicine and longtime adviser to the CDC. "They're going to be the drivers of spread in the community."
https://www.journalofhospitalinfection.com/article/S0195-6701(20)30102-X/pdfOverall, viral load above detection limit was detected until 14 and 25 days after symptoms onset and for 13 and 11 days after the first detection, respectively.[7]
DennisN said:@bhobba , what do you mean by "taking a Biologic", I wonder?
Based on what little info I’ve found about available tests, they’re not doing full sequences. This test from Applied Biosystems:atyy said:https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2762688
Take a look at Figure 2 in the above article, a quick glance at the PCR Ct values seems to support @Ygggdrasil's guess - in a given patient one can have ND (non-detectable) values even with previous and subsequent days above detectability.
BTW, I don't think the statement from @Vanadium 50's doc can be generally right, because if a full sequence is done, I would expect essentially 100% accuracy with no false negatives for any patient (but with false negative for particular samples from a patient). The only thing is of course that a full sequence is not a sort of test you run on massive numbers of people (@Ygggdrasil please correct if wrong)
One of the CDC people said on TV that the virus can last several days on hard, polished surfaces, particularly metal.morrobay said:Have there been any documented cases of infection from surfaces like rails at malls and public transportation? There can be exposures but not in high enough numbers to be infectious.
bhobba said:Ok - a little information about treating Auto immune diseases of which the most common are Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriasis including Psoriatic Arthritis, Lupus etc. I have heard about 10% of the population have them. ...
As I said 10% have autoimmune diseases and hence compromised or suppressed immune systems, so take that into account when hearing 80% come through the new coronovirus just fine. That's of no consolation to them at all.
I'm very sorry to hear that. Take care and stay safe!bhobba said:Now since my immune system has never seen this new coronovirus before and I now have a superhighway through it the chances of me fighting it off is severely reduced.
Both, I think.kyphysics said:QUICK QUESTION:
Does asymptomatic mean you are not exhibiting the symptoms and NEVER will (as in you do carry the virus, but for whatever reason, your body is handling it fine and you won't ever have any issues manifest physically) OR that they JUST HAVEN'T SHOWN UP YET?
https://www.technologyreview.com/s/615353/singapore-is-the-model-for-how-to-handle-the-coronavirus/ said:It’s not simply the ability to detect the cases and explain why they happened that makes Singapore such a role model in this epidemic; nucleic acid testing kits were rapidly developed and deployed to ports of entry. Within three hours, while individuals are quarantined on-site, officials can confirm whether or not they are infected with the virus before allowing them to enter.
It means that at some point in time a determination was they you (or whoever) showed no symptoms (by what ever method of discerning symptoms was used).kyphysics said:QUICK QUESTION:
Does asymptomatic mean you are not exhibiting the symptoms and NEVER will (as in you do carry the virus, but for whatever reason, your body is handling it fine and you won't ever have any issues manifest physically) OR that they JUST HAVEN'T SHOWN UP YET?
thanks!
Are you sure that’s the reason?chirhone said:(considering both of their limitations in not able to get the core temperature which can work better by inserting the thermometer at the anuses. This is not advisable at the checkpoints because people can transfer feces).
An update:Ygggdrasil said:Hoarders at their worst:
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/14/technology/coronavirus-purell-wipes-amazon-sellers.html
Yes but surviving on some surface and then transferring in large enough numbers to cause an infection are two different things. From an infected person to the surface then to someone touching the surface then touching face. If there were surfaces infections it would seem infections would be orders of magnitude greater.phinds said:One of the CDC people said on TV that the virus can last several days on hard, polished surfaces, particularly metal.
Just to be sure I understand, this is not BAD for the patient him/herself, right? I agree with your point later that it would be horrible for everyone else, who the asymptomatic person is spreading the virus to. But, for the person without symptoms, they don't just suddenly die, right?BillTre said:You could be very infected but show no symptoms for some reason.
Do you mean reinfected later and then show symptoms the second time around? I thought once you get infected and fight the virus off that your body is now immune to it and it won't harm you anymore?In any case, you could still get infected later (unless you are already immune), and show symptoms then.
If one is infected and does not show symptoms does not mean they would not show symptoms later. In any case, you could still get infected later (unless you are already immune), and show symptoms then.kyphysics said:Just to be sure I understand, this is not BAD for the patient him/herself, right?
No. A person already infected should have immunity or they would not have gotten uninfected.kyphysics said:Do you mean reinfected later and then show symptoms the second time around?
Right, it is just bad for others who might get infected from that person. At least that person doesn't cough/sneeze the virus around (by definition - that would be a symptom).kyphysics said:Just to be sure I understand, this is not BAD for the patient him/herself, right?