Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Crank it hard

  1. Jun 8, 2005 #1
    Wow, just reading through some of the stuff at crack.net, and came across this amazing insight:

    Even earlier, the Michelson-Morley experiment created the need for relativity. It failed to find an etheric medium in space for conducting light waves. In fact, it failed to produce any result. A looked-for diffraction pattern did not appear. The absence of a result is not a valid basis for conclusions in science. Any number of explanations exist for the result.

    I can begin to see how we get these people and their amazing crackpot theories appearing... You should see the copy I've got of a 'theory' that got sent to my department a few months ago. Perhaps I should scan it and put it up. Some choice quotes:

    "Planck has to jurisdiction here", "In this model there is only one clock, no need for relativity", "The rest of physics ensues forthwith" etc. Amazing.
  2. jcsd
  3. Jun 8, 2005 #2


    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Well, not quite - the logic goes as follows:

    Hypothesis: If there is an ether, this experiment will detect it via an interference pattern.
    Experimental data: no interference pattern witnessed.
    Conclusion: This experiment does not support the hypothesis that there is an ether and adds constraints to what an ether may "look like" if it does exist.

    However, yes - relativity crackpottery is an interesting phenomena.
  4. Jun 8, 2005 #3
    It's not crackpottery. There's a legitimate worldwide concerted effort on the part of mainstream physicists to keep their groundbreaking ideas from flourishing.
  5. Jun 8, 2005 #4


    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor

    And as with any quackery, simply by stating something without any valid evidence is considered to be sufficient enough.

  6. Jun 8, 2005 #5
    I forgot to mention the evil energy companies that are conspiring to keep perpetual motion machines off the market.
  7. Jun 9, 2005 #6


    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    My sarcasm detector appears to be malfunctioning - could you clarify and tell me if you're serious here?
  8. Jun 9, 2005 #7
    It's the comedy stylings of juvenal and ZapperZ. I hear they're doing Vegas this summer.
  9. Jun 9, 2005 #8
    I'm in dead earnest.:smile:

    (Instead of being an Elvis, Barry White, or Elton John impersonator in Vegas, I could be a crank impersonator).
    Last edited: Jun 9, 2005
  10. Jun 9, 2005 #9
    For tickets to the comedy stylings of juvenal and ZapperZ (Who perform onstage as Phizzy and Cranky) call your local Ticketmaster today!
  11. Jun 9, 2005 #10
    'This Physics is sound, I just need someone to write it in equations;
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Crank it hard
  1. Hard (Replies: 4)

  2. Crank That Sigma Boy (Replies: 45)

  3. Are all cranks male? (Replies: 38)