Creating a One-Sided Magnet? | Natural Occurrence of Magnets

  • Thread starter Thread starter Femme_physics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnetism
AI Thread Summary
Cutting a magnet at its pole boundary will not create a one-sided magnet; instead, it results in two separate magnets, each with a north and south pole. Magnetic fields are inherently bipolar, meaning they always have both a north and a south pole. The discussion emphasizes that magnetic field lines are continuous loops, existing even within the magnet itself. There are no naturally occurring one-sided magnets due to this fundamental property of magnetic fields. Thus, any attempt to create a one-sided magnet is fundamentally flawed.
Femme_physics
Gold Member
Messages
2,548
Reaction score
1
If I cut a magnet exactly where the border of its south and north pole is...does it mean I'm creating a one-sided magnet?

Also, are one sided magnets naturally-occurring?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No , you will then create 2 magnets with both north and south poles.
B fields always have a North and a south pole.
 
Ah...that's interesting... thanks :)
 
cragar said:
No , you will then create 2 magnets with both north and south poles.
B fields always have a North and a south pole.

I should say, rather, that B fields (field 'lines') have no end to them - they are looped, passing through more intenser regions, which we tend to refer to as Poles. Inside a permanent magnet (or a solenoid) the field 'lines' are still there.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.

Similar threads

Back
Top