Creation/Ann operators acting on <x|p>

  • Thread starter Thread starter LostConjugate
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operators
LostConjugate
Messages
850
Reaction score
3
What does it mean for a creation or annihilation operator to act on the state <x|p>. For example:

a_p e^{ip \cdot x}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
<x|p>
This is not a state. It's just a number. In the second formula you have an operator multiplied by a number.
 
haael said:
This is not a state. It's just a number. In the second formula you have an operator multiplied by a number.

Ok, will try to give it in context.

What does it mean to write a free field scalar as a linear sum of creation and annihilation operators like this?

<br /> <br /> \int \frac{d^3 p}{{(2\pi)}^3}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\omega_p}} [ a_p e^{ip \cdot x} + a_p^\dagger e^{-ip \cdot x} ]<br />

What is the creation / annihilation operator role in this, it ends up acting on the amplitude...

a = \sqrt{\frac{\omega}{2}}q + \frac{i}{\sqrt{2\omega}}p
 
Last edited:
What does it mean to write a free field scalar as a linear sum of creation and annihilation operators like this?
This is a functional transform, much just like the Fourier transform. You have a bunch of creation/annihilation operators that depend on a parameter p. You transform them into another operator set that depends on x.

Annihilation operators here do not "act" on anything. Rather, they are a subject of transformation. The result of the transformation is another operator that may act on something.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top