MHB Critical Points & Extrema of f (x, y)

Click For Summary
The critical point of the function f(x, y) = x^3 + y^3 is found at (0, 0), where both partial derivatives equal zero. The Second Partials Test is inconclusive at this point since the determinant d equals zero, indicating that the test fails to determine the nature of the critical point. The discussion explains that the point (0, 0) is a saddle point, as it behaves like a stationary point of inflection in 3D. To demonstrate this, one must show that moving in certain directions from (0, 0) results in a decrease in function value, while moving in other directions results in an increase.
harpazo
Messages
208
Reaction score
16
Find the critical points and test for relative extrema. List the critical points for which the Second Partials Test fails.

f (x, y) = x^3 + y^3

Solution:

f_x = 3x^2

f_y = 3y^2

f_xx = 6x

f_th = 6y

f_2xy = 0

I set f_x and f_y = 0 and found the critical points to be
(0, 0).

Is this right so far?

d = (6x)(6y) - [0]^2

d = 36xy

d = 36 (0)(0) - 0

d = 0

Since d = 0, the test is inconclusive.

I evaluated f (x, y) at (0, 0) and found the point in space to be (0, 0, 0).

The textbook goes on to say that the test for relative extrema fails and that we have a saddle point here.

1. Why does the test fails here?

2. I am not too sure how to show that we have a saddle point in this case.

Can someone explain this question in simple terms?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Harpazo said:
Find the critical points and test for relative extrema. List the critical points for which the Second Partials Test fails.

f (x, y) = x^3 + y^3

Solution:

f_x = 3x^2

f_y = 3y^2

f_xx = 6x

f_th = 6y

f_2xy = 0

I set f_x and f_y = 0 and found the critical points to be
(0, 0).

Is this right so far?

d = (6x)(6y) - [0]^2

d = 36xy

d = 36 (0)(0) - 0

d = 0

Since d = 0, the test is inconclusive.

I evaluated f (x, y) at (0, 0) and found the point in space to be (0, 0, 0).

The textbook goes on to say that the test for relative extrema fails and that we have a saddle point here.

1. Why does the test fails here?

2. I am not too sure how to show that we have a saddle point in this case.

Can someone explain this question in simple terms?

In 3D a saddle point is the equivalent of a stationary point of inflection in 2D. As this function is the sum of two functions which have SPOIs at (0,0) it makes sense that in 3D you would have a saddle point.

As for proving it, you need to show that movement in some directions from that point results in a decrease while movement in other directions from that point results in an increase. That would be enough to show that it is not a maximum or a minimum, and thus is a saddle point.
 
Thread 'Problem with calculating projections of curl using rotation of contour'
Hello! I tried to calculate projections of curl using rotation of coordinate system but I encountered with following problem. Given: ##rot_xA=\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial y}-\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial z}=0## ##rot_yA=\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial z}-\frac{\partial A_z}{\partial x}=1## ##rot_zA=\frac{\partial A_y}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial A_x}{\partial y}=0## I rotated ##yz##-plane of this coordinate system by an angle ##45## degrees about ##x##-axis and used rotation matrix to...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K