Criticisms of Jaynes' approach to Statistical Mechanics

AI Thread Summary
Jaynes' approach to statistical mechanics, framed as an inference theory of many-body systems, has drawn criticism, particularly regarding its dismissal of classical interpretations. Concerns center on how this perspective addresses challenges like Maxwell's Demon, which raises questions about entropy and information in thermodynamic systems. Critics argue that the information-theoretic framework may struggle to fully account for the implications of quantum mechanics on observation and measurement. Recent literature suggests that Maxwell's Demon can be reconciled with information theory, but this remains a contentious topic in the field. The ongoing debate highlights the complexities of integrating information theory with traditional statistical mechanics principles.
DarMM
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
2,369
Reaction score
1,408
In his well known paper “Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics” Jaynes attempted to formulated statistical mechanics as "nothing more" than the inference theory of many body mechanical systems. I am looking for critiques of this approach. Also of use would be summaries or reviews of the "current state of debate".
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have not read it. But that "nothing more" part is kind of worrying. How does he preclude Maxwell's Demon?

If I understand correctly, the usual way to preclude MD comes down to quantum mechanics. MD has to make observations.
 
DarMM said:
Summary: Seeking references for criticisms of Jaynes's information theoretic approach to Statistical Mechanics.

In his well known paper “Information Theory and Statistical Mechanics” Jaynes attempted to formulated statistical mechanics as "nothing more" than the inference theory of many body mechanical systems. I am looking for critiques of this approach. Also of use would be summaries or reviews of the "current state of debate".

Here are a few; I can't vouch for how valid they are:

https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/82621859.pdfhttps://arxiv.org/pdf/1103.4003.pdfhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20116117?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
 
  • Like
Likes DarMM
DEvens said:
I have not read it. But that "nothing more" part is kind of worrying. How does he preclude Maxwell's Demon?

If I understand correctly, the usual way to preclude MD comes down to quantum mechanics. MD has to make observations.
Maxwell's demon is "driven out" by Szilard and precisely by applying the information theoretical approach to the notion of entropy.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01341281
A quantum version has been realized recently:

https://arxiv.org/abs/1702.05161
If you look for counterarguments against the information-theoretical foundation of statistical physics, Maxwell's demon will give you a hard time!
 
  • Like
Likes DarMM
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top