Cross Correlation Functions: Advanced Applications & Conclusions

csopi
Messages
81
Reaction score
2
Hi.

Can somebody recommend a good book (advanced level) dealing with applications of cross correlation functions? I mean what kind of conclusions can be drawn etc?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cross correlation functions are used a lot to estimate coherence and time delay between two timeseries. Under certain assumptions the maximum likelihood estimate of time delay uses the cross-correlation function. This is done all the time in signal and image processing. Carter is a name that comes to mind as someone who has published a lot in this area if you want to look in the literature. Not sure if there are any good books on this, though.

good luck,

jason
 
I would recommend thinking of cross-correlation as an application of using inner product spaces. If that sounds a little advanced, no worries--it's not as scary as it sounds.

You can think of cross-correlation in terms of probability estimates (coherence and maximum likelihood) or in terms of deterministic problems. Seismology signal processing papers (many online, for free) make good teaching guides. In addition, seach terms for "matched filter". Sometimes an explicit application is great for teaching. If you have access to MATLAB, this also makes for a good teaching tool. You can use xcor to your hearts content. Finally, if you use cross-correlation with it's Fourier Transform Theorem, you will find the properties more useful. It is a great tool! Good luck.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top