Understanding Cross Section in Physics: Dimension and Formula Explanation

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the formula for differential cross-section in physics, specifically its dimensional analysis. The differential cross-section, represented as dσ/dΩ, indeed has units of area, confirming its relation to surface dimensions. Participants question the dimensions of the variables involved, such as mi, mf, pi, pf, and T, and express confusion about achieving L*L in the context of the formula. There is also mention of the potential simplifications using natural units, such as setting c or ħ to 1, which complicates dimensional calculations. Overall, the conversation seeks clarity on the derivation and implications of the differential cross-section formula in physics.
naima
Gold Member
Messages
936
Reaction score
54
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
naima said:
Hi all

I found http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross_section_(physics)#Relation_to_the_S_matrix" on wikipedia:

{d\sigma \over d\Omega} = (2\pi)^4 m_i m_f {p_f \over p_i} |T_{fi}|^2

Has it the dimension of a surface? (I only see M*M)
It is the first time I read this formula about differential cross section.
Yes, the microscopic cross-section σ has units of area.

The differential cross-section is a measure of how the microscopic cross-section, σ, changes with respect to the solid angle, Ω.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Of course, but what are the dimensions of mi mf pi pf and T?
and how do you get L*L?
 
I am sure that there is a c = 1 or a hbar = 1 in this formula which disables one to do dimesional calculus.
Do you know how this equality is deduced?
 
Thread 'Unexpected irregular reflection signal from a high-finesse cavity'
I am observing an irregular, aperiodic noise pattern in the reflection signal of a high-finesse optical cavity (finesse ≈ 20,000). The cavity is normally operated using a standard Pound–Drever–Hall (PDH) locking configuration, where an EOM provides phase modulation. The signals shown in the attached figures were recorded with the modulation turned off. Under these conditions, when scanning the laser frequency across a cavity resonance, I expected to observe a simple reflection dip. Instead...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
880
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K