Cryptography Forums: Recommended for Hobby/Puzzle Enthusiasts

  • Thread starter Thread starter mm71
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cryptography
AI Thread Summary
Participants in the discussion seek recommendations for cryptography forums tailored to hobbyists and puzzle enthusiasts, noting a lack of suitable options. They mention sci.crypt as a viable choice due to its active community. The conversation highlights ongoing efforts to solve specific puzzles from a book, emphasizing that the puzzles should not be overly complex. Links to two puzzles are shared, indicating a collaborative approach to problem-solving. The thread reflects a desire for simpler solutions to cryptographic challenges.
mm71
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Can anyone recommend a cryptography related forum? Particularly for hobby/puzzle enthusiasts.. I'm coming up dry.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Thanks. I'll hop into sci.crypt - seems to be a pretty active newsgroup! If anyone is interested, me and a few others have been trying to solve these "puzzles" for a while with limited success.. they shouldn't be too mathematically intense as they come from a book where the author has stated his background in math/cryptography is limited.

http://multimatter.com/wiki/index.php?title=Vegas_Die:_Card_Suit_Puzzles
http://multimatter.com/wiki/index.php?title=Vegas_Die:_Napkin_Puzzle

I have probably been over analyzing these, there has got to be a simple answer.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top