I Can E(M,K) = C Replace Ek(M) = C in Cryptography Notation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the notation used in cryptography, specifically whether E(M,K) = C can replace Ek(M) = C, given that E depends on K. Participants agree that the choice of notation is largely a matter of style rather than a strict rule. The original poster seeks clarification on this notation and its implications. The conversation highlights the flexibility in representing encryption functions while maintaining clarity. Ultimately, the consensus is that both notations can be valid depending on context and preference.
Teachme
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
I was just reading a cryptography book and have a question about something the author states I highlighed the statement in yellow and included a pictures.
So I was wondering if the function could be written as E(M,K) = C instead of Ek(M)=C since the fact that E is dependent on K. If not why couldn't you write it as this?

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • crypt.png
    crypt.png
    1.9 KB · Views: 487
Physics news on Phys.org
Attached file is unreadable.
 
Sorry thanks,
here is fixed pic
 

Attachments

  • crypt.png
    crypt.png
    15.4 KB · Views: 461
It is more a matter of style than anything else.
 

Thread 'Deductive proof in logic formal systems'

I was reading documentation about the soundness and completeness of logic formal systems. Consider the following $$\vdash_S \phi$$ where ##S## is the proof-system making part the formal system and ##\phi## is a wff (well formed formula) of the formal language. Note the blank on left of the turnstile symbol ##\vdash_S##, as far as I can tell it actually represents the empty set. So what does it mean ? I guess it actually means ##\phi## is a theorem of the formal system, i.e. there is a...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Notation questions about kernel, cokernel, image and coimage
Replies
7
Views
682
I Strange index notation for linear transformation matrix
Replies
4
Views
1K
I Enumerating a Large Ordinal: Can We Find a Limit to the Continuum?
Replies
27
Views
3K
I Direct limit of multiverse models of ZFC
Replies
2
Views
2K
I No structure in ##(d,x)## in ##\textbf{Met*}(X)## is admissible
Replies
0
Views
1K
I Showing ##k[x_1,\ldots,x_n]/\mathfrak{a}## is finite dimensional
Replies
40
Views
2K
B Can I replace ##X_n = i## with ##A## to type less? Rules of math.
Replies
5
Views
1K
I Question about "A Group Epimorphism is Surjective"
Replies
13
Views
638
I Why does the author use the notation ##f_c(d)## instead of ##f(c,d)##?
Replies
4
Views
2K
B From dE=dm*c^2 to E=m*c^2: Integration constant?
Replies
10
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top