Crystal Field Model: True/False Questions for Octahedral Complex Ions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the Crystal Field Model for octahedral complex ions, particularly regarding the validity of various statements. Statements a, d, and e are confirmed as true, while statement c is debated, as a large crystal field splitting energy does not guarantee a diamagnetic complex due to the possibility of unpaired electrons. Statement g is also questioned for clarity, as it suggests that the energy splitting of 3d orbitals is influenced by ligands, which is explained through coulombic repulsion. The participants emphasize the importance of understanding electron configurations and the implications of crystal field splitting on magnetic properties. Overall, clarity in the definitions and implications of these concepts is crucial for accurate interpretation.
SamTsui86
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Which of the following are true for the Crystal Field Model of an octahedral complex ion? Consider ions to be from first-row transition metals.



a) Two of the 3d orbitals point directly at ligands

b) t2 orbitals are less stable than e orbitals

c) A large crystal field splitting energy results in a diamagnetic complex

d) The high-spin case gives maximum unpaired electrons

e) For a given ligand, Fe3+ increases splitting less than Fe2+

f) Cl- causes a greater increase in the crystal field splitting energy than does H2O

g) The splitting of energy (E) of 3d orbitals occurs in the ligands


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I put acde and I am pretty sure I am right, what am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SamTsui86 said:

Homework Statement


...

c) A large crystal field splitting energy results in a diamagnetic complex

...

g) The splitting of energy (E) of 3d orbitals occurs in the ligands

...

The statement c isn't technically right and g is unclearly worded to me.

For statement C if there are an odd number of electrons it is still diamagnetic. By most standards diamagnetic means no unpaired electrons and if there are an odd number electrons it going to have to be unpaired. A large splitting energy makes it hard to move the electons up in energy to the Eg orbitals but the unpaired electron can occur in T2g orbitals

Statement G: Crystal field theory assumes coulombic repulsion. The ligands attach on the axis making a higher electron density on those 2 d orbitals. This increases the repulsion and that is why those two orbitals split and become higher in energy. So in a way the splitting energy does come the ligands
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top