Crystal model with periodic boundary conditions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implications of using periodic boundary conditions in crystal models, specifically regarding the size of basis translation vectors (e1 and e2) and their reciprocal lattice counterparts (k1 and k2). It is established that large translation vectors lead to a dense distribution of k-points, effectively making reciprocal space continuous. This approach is essential for accurately modeling real-world crystals, which often require a simulation box containing thousands to millions of unit cells. However, this approximation fails when dealing with nanomaterials, where crystal grains are significantly smaller.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of periodic boundary conditions in crystallography
  • Familiarity with reciprocal lattice concepts
  • Knowledge of unit cell dimensions and their significance in crystal modeling
  • Basic principles of nanomaterials and their unique properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical treatment of periodic boundary conditions in crystal structures
  • Explore the implications of reciprocal lattice theory on electronic properties of materials
  • Study the effects of nanomaterial grain sizes on crystal behavior
  • Investigate computational tools for simulating large-scale crystal models, such as VASP or Quantum ESPRESSO
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, materials scientists, and physicists interested in crystallography, particularly those working with large-scale crystal simulations and nanomaterials.

Mechdude
Messages
108
Reaction score
1
user meopemuk mentioned this:
In the case of a crystal model with periodic boundary conditions, basis translation vectors e1 and e2 are very large (presumably infinite), which means that basis vectors of the reciprocal lattice k1 and k2 are very small, so the distribution of k-points is very dense (presumably continuous).

here : meopeuk
i do not get his argument, is there a place where i can find a thorough treatment of the thinking behind translation vectors being huge for periodic crystal boundary conditions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Boundary conditions are necessary for the systematic mathematical treatment of crystals. The distance of the boundaries (size of the box in which the calculations are carried out) does not have to be large.

But in order to realistically treat real-world crystals it should be. Unit cell sizes are mostly a few nanometers or less, and physical crystals usually are ~10 micrometers or millimeters at least. So the box has to be 10000 or 1 million unit cells - which is almost as good as infinite, and in many ways infinite is preferable, because then reciprocal space becomes continuous rather than discrete.

This approximation breaks down when you start working with nanomaterials, where the crystal "grains" are only a few unit cells large. Then ... interesting... things happen.
 
M Quack said:
Boundary conditions are necessary for the systematic mathematical treatment of crystals. The distance of the boundaries (size of the box in which the calculations are carried out) does not have to be large.

But in order to realistically treat real-world crystals it should be. Unit cell sizes are mostly a few nanometers or less, and physical crystals usually are ~10 micrometers or millimeters at least. So the box has to be 10000 or 1 million unit cells - which is almost as good as infinite, and in many ways infinite is preferable, because then reciprocal space becomes continuous rather than discrete.

This approximation breaks down when you start working with nanomaterials, where the crystal "grains" are only a few unit cells large. Then ... interesting... things happen.

Thanks for the reply M Quack,
so meopemuk used this physical reason to come up with the concept of large (relative to unit cells) translation vectors? and the corresponding small reciprocal vectors?
mechdude.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K