Curing Long-Term Illness: Is Science the Answer?

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of finding scientifically controlled cures for long-term illnesses, particularly chronic diseases like Alzheimer's. It highlights a Catch-22 situation where it takes years to assess the effects of treatments, often resulting in early patients suffering or dying before effective solutions are found. The conversation notes that the increased prevalence of diseases like Alzheimer's is partly due to longer life expectancies, as earlier generations did not live long enough to exhibit symptoms. Even if a cure for Alzheimer's is discovered, it raises concerns about potential new, severe conditions that may emerge in older age, leading to a cycle of suffering while future cures are sought. This underscores the complexities and ethical dilemmas in medical interventions for chronic illnesses.
wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
555
to possible cures for long term illness, can it be done in a scientifically controlled way?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Do you mean informing people or via some medical intervention?

If I got you correctly:

There is a kind of Catch-22 to what you're asking. It takes years to determine effects of procedures/medicines etc on progression of a chronic long term disease. So when the disease first shows up on the radar, it takes years to find a solution. The first people to get it, die from it -- or wish they had.

Alzheimer's disease was not as common in 1900 as it now is: mainly because people in 1900 did not on average live long enough to show symtoms. So, we cured or staved off a lot of the other factors for early death. Now, assume we cure Alzheimers. And you benefit from it. You'll be the first to get an as yet unrecognized supremely unpleasant infirmity that only shows up in extreme old age... so you can die from that condition or live years in total misery with it... while they look ofr a cure.

Gives you the warm fuzzies.
 
https://www.nhs.uk/mental-health/conditions/body-dysmorphia/ Most people have some mild apprehension about their body, such as one thinks their nose is too big, hair too straight or curvy. At the extreme, cases such as this, are difficult to completely understand. https://www.msn.com/en-ca/health/other/why-would-someone-want-to-amputate-healthy-limbs/ar-AA1MrQK7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=68ce4014b1fe4953b0b4bd22ef471ab9&ei=78 they feel like they're an amputee in the body of a regular person "For...
Thread 'Did they discover another descendant of homo erectus?'
The study provides critical new insights into the African Humid Period, a time between 14,500 and 5,000 years ago when the Sahara desert was a green savanna, rich in water bodies that facilitated human habitation and the spread of pastoralism. Later aridification turned this region into the world's largest desert. Due to the extreme aridity of the region today, DNA preservation is poor, making this pioneering ancient DNA study all the more significant. Genomic analyses reveal that the...
Whenever these opiods are mentioned they usually mention that e.g. fentanyl is "50 times stronger than heroin" and "100 times stronger than morphine". Now it's nitazene which the public is told is everything from "much stronger than heroin" and "200 times stronger than fentany"! Do these numbers make sense at all? How do they arrive at them? Kill thousands of mice? En passant: nitazene have already been found in both Oxycontin pills and in street "heroin" here, so Naloxone is more...
Back
Top