Curl of velocity vector in rotational motion

brotherbobby
Messages
774
Reaction score
172
TL;DR
In rotational motion, ##\boxed{\vec v = \vec\omega\times\vec r}##, irrespective of whether the angular velocity ##\vec\omega## is constant or not (I hope I am correct in saying this). However, the curl of velocity vector, ##\mathbf{\vec\nabla\times\vec v=2\vec\omega}## comes out only to be true if the angular velocity of the rotating body is ##\vec\omega## constant. Is this true? I show the details below.
1774865847447.webp
Attempt :
I draw the diagram of the problem to the right. A circular plate of radius ##a## rotates with an angular velocity ##\vec\omega = \omega_0\hat k##, assumed constant for the moment. A particle P at rest with the plate lies on the rim along the ##x## axis, as shown. Its velocity is ##\vec v= v\hat j## and its position vector ##\vec r = a\hat i##. Using the right hand rule, these vectors make sense : ##\vec v = \vec\omega_0\times\vec r\Rightarrow v=\omega_0 a##, remembering that ##\hat j = \hat k\times\hat i##. Calculating the curl of this vector using index notation, ##\small{\vec\nabla\times\vec v = \vec\nabla\times(\vec\omega_0\times\vec r)=\epsilon_{ijk}\partial_j(\vec\omega_0\times\vec r)_k\hat e_i = \epsilon_{kij}\epsilon_{klm}\partial_j\,\omega_{0_l}\,x_m \hat e_i=(\delta_{il}\delta_{jm} -\delta_{im}\delta_{jl})\partial_j\,\omega_{0_l}\,x_m \hat e_i}##, which reduces to ##\small={\partial_j\,\omega_{0_i}\,x_j \hat e_i-\partial_j\,\omega_{0_j}\,x_i \hat e_i=3\vec\omega_0-\vec\omega_0=2\omega_0}\Rightarrow \boxed{\vec\nabla\times\vec v=2\vec\omega_0}##, where I have used the fact that ##\vec\omega_0## is uniform and ##\partial_i x_j = \delta_{ij}##. This can also be shown using the method of determinants for the cross product.

Question : Clearly, from my derivation, the angular velocity ##\vec\omega_0## is constant. Does it have to be? In which case, I am mistaken in what I have shown. Can it not be that the curl of the velocity vector at a given time ##t## equals twice the angular velocity at that time : ##\vec\nabla\times\vec v(t)=2\vec\omega(t)##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
brotherbobby said:
However, the curl of velocity vector, ##\mathbf{\vec\nabla\times\vec v=2\vec\omega}## comes out only to be true if the angular velocity of the rotating body is ##\vec\omega## constant. Is this true?
Constant with respect to what? Time or position? If ##\omega## varies with respect to r, then curl is different than when it doesn't. If ##\omega## varies with respect to t, then so will the curl.

See also:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
777
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
883
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K