Current density peaks at the interface conductor/insulator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the phenomenon of current density peaks at the interface between conductors and insulators, specifically in the context of a catheter model using COMSOL Multiphysics. Rossana observed significant peaks in current density, with values reaching 305,937 A/m² at the interface where a plastic cuff meets the electrode. The analysis concluded that these peaks are not artifacts but rather a natural result of differing electrical conductivities (sigma) and high voltage gradients (grad(V)) in curved geometries. Adjusting the cuff's angle and material properties influenced the peak values, confirming the importance of conductivity over permittivity in this scenario.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrical conductivity (sigma) and its role in current density
  • Familiarity with voltage gradients (grad(V)) in electrical engineering
  • Basic knowledge of COMSOL Multiphysics for modeling electrical phenomena
  • Concept of geometric influences on electrical fields in conductive materials
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the impact of different materials on electrical conductivity in COMSOL Multiphysics
  • Investigate the relationship between voltage gradients and current density in curved geometries
  • Conduct a parametric study on the effects of varying sigma values in electrical models
  • Research the implications of skin effect in AC versus DC electrical modeling
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for electrical engineers, researchers in biomedical engineering, and anyone involved in the design and analysis of catheter systems or similar electrical interfaces. It provides insights into the behavior of current density in complex geometries and materials.

No_127_0_0_1
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone,

I have a physics problem that I have been struggling with for a long time. Many many hours of searching around for theoretical or practical answers have not given me anything definitive.

The question is in the context of electrical engineering, more specifically peaks in current density at the edge between insulators and conductors.

I find peaks solving models in COMSOL multiphysics software and I have modified the geometry to remove any sharp corner to avoid singularities, but the peaks remain.

Here is the context: I am modeling ablation through a catheter. The catheter has a voltage applied.
To show it graphically, I used a simple 2D axysimmetrical model (so it is actually 3D) to check the current density in specific spots around an electrode.

Here is an image that summarizes both the geometry and the problem that I am encountering. All around the electrode and shaft, there is biological tissue.

current_density_peaks.jpg


The electrode is at the end of a catheter and has a "cuff" that is made of plastic and partly covers the bottom part of the electrode (the part with the highest curvature).

In reality, in our lab-made catheters, the cuff is tangent to the electrode.
In COMSOL the results show a huge peak in the current density at the point where the cuff meets the electrode.

If I remove the cuff, there is still a higher current density in the area, since the electrode has a curvature in that area. But the peak without cuff is much smaller than the peak with cuff:

I tried changing the tangent angle, making the cuff perpendicular to the electrode. This causes a peak still, but an order to magnitude less than the tangent cuff case.

Without cuff, the max current density is 23,042 A/m^2. With tangent cuff it is 305,937 A/m^2. With perpendicular cuff it is 46,212 A/m^2

The same thing happens for a lot of other types of geometries where an insulator meets a conductor. I know there is going to be a high gradient for V when you go from insulator to conductor but it still does not explain the tiny area of sharp peak in current density.

The results make me wonder whether the peaks for both tangent and perpendicular cuff are the result of a singularity and if, in reality, there is a peak in that location or not.
If I make the mesh finer, the value of the peak in current density increases, which also makes me think of an artifact / singularity.

Now, with the tangent cuff, one could argue that if there is a singularity.
But with a perpendicular cuff, you already have an angle that is as wide as it can possibly be. So I don’t see how that can be a singularity.

So I was wondering: has anyone ever seen either in theoretical computation or in practical application that if you add an insulator that partly cover a conductive surface you have a sharp (but with small area) peak at the interface between the insulator and the conductor?

I would greatly appreciate any feedback on this.

Thank you so much in advance

Best regards

Rossana
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Currents do tend to concentrate near the surface. Read up on skin effect to understand why.

It helps to understand that the energy of electricity is in the magnetic and electric fields. These fields propagate near, but not in the conductors.

You might try another material with a lower (or higher) dielectric constant for your sleeve.
 
Thanks Jeff. In DC, which is what I am modeling, there would be no skin effect.
However your suggestion of trying different permittivity values made me think of a parametric study where I set different material values to different regions.
I believe I solved the problem:
The permittivity does not make any difference in such peaks. Only sigma, the electrical conductivity, does. It makes sense given that the current density J can me approximated as sigma*E and E is -grad(V).
The peaks are not an artifact but a natural consequence of the differences in sigma in combination with high grad(V) in curved areas.

Thank you :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K