Calculating electrode current density

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating electrode current density for a hollow copper tube submerged in an electrolyte. The required current density is specified as 200 mA per cm². It is established that only the surface area of the copper that is in contact with the electrolyte should be considered for current calculations, as areas not in contact with the solution are irrelevant to the current density definition. This clarification simplifies the calculation process significantly.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of current density in electrical engineering
  • Familiarity with electrochemical principles
  • Knowledge of electrode design and function
  • Basic concepts of electrolytic solutions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of electrochemistry and current density calculations
  • Explore the design considerations for electrodes in electrolytic cells
  • Learn about the effects of surface area on electrochemical reactions
  • Investigate different types of electrolytes and their properties
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for electrical engineers, electrochemists, and anyone involved in designing or analyzing electrochemical systems and electrode performance.

Zensation
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
This is more electrical engineering than chemistry I would think.

If the current density required is 200mA per cm^2, and the electrode is a hollow copper tube that is submersed in an electrolyte in which the inside of the tube is not touching any solution, should the current be calculated based on strictly the part of the copper that is touching the solution, or all of the copper surface area?

Should the surface area of an exposed electrode only be considered the areas that are touching and conducting in the electrolyte? Or should the areas not touching be included as well, when it comes to calculating the current based off the required current density?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The required current density of what? Probably the contact surface to the solution - in this case, the answer is directly in the definition.

Surfaces not touching anything (except air) are probably not relevant.
 
Thank you :).

That's what I was thinking as I was typing the post out but I wanted to make sure. That sure does simplify things a lot for me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K