Current Division: Find Load Resistor Current for 4 Resistors

  • Thread starter Thread starter Marcin H
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Current Division
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on applying the current division principle to find the load resistor current for four different resistors, specifically using a Norton equivalent circuit. The correct formula for calculating the load current (I_L) is established as I_L = I_Norton * (R_Norton / (R_L + R_Norton)), where R_L is the load resistor (e.g., 560 ohms) and R_Norton is the Norton equivalent resistance. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between the resistances and the current flow, particularly in extreme cases where one resistance is significantly larger than the other.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of current division in electrical circuits
  • Familiarity with Norton equivalent circuits
  • Basic knowledge of resistor values and their impact on current flow
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations for circuit analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Norton’s theorem in circuit analysis
  • Learn about the implications of extreme resistance values in current division
  • Explore practical examples of current division with varying resistor values
  • Review circuit simulation tools to visualize current flow in complex circuits
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of current division and Norton equivalent circuits.

Marcin H
Messages
306
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement


Capture.JPG

Find the load resistor current for 4 different resistors.

Homework Equations


Current Division

The Attempt at a Solution


I need to use current division to find the load resistor current for 4 different resistors, but I am not sure how to apply it here. I have I_norton and R_norton and the RL is also given as one of the resistors (560ohms for example). How can I apply current division here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What about the current division is giving you issues? Have you applied the current division equation before? What are the important quantities you need to look at to apply current division?
 
axmls said:
What about the current division is giving you issues? Have you applied the current division equation before? What are the important quantities you need to look at to apply current division?
I haven't had much experience with it. Looking off an example from my notes, I think this would be it.

I_load= I_N(Rx/(Rx+RN)

Rx being the 560ohm resistor for example. Is that right?

EDIT: changed Rth to RN*******
 
I'm assuming Rth is your Norton resistor?

This isn't exactly correct, though the form is correct. To see why, let's assume you have the same circuit you have right now, but assume your load resistor is HUGE, and your norton equivalent resistance is small. Then qualitatively, you could see that most of the current would go through the Norton resistor (it's a path of less resistance). Then let's apply your current division equation to this situation to get the current through the load:
$$I_L = I_N \frac{R_L}{R_N + R_L}$$
But notice that this fraction is very close to ##1## (because the load resistor is huge and the Norton resistance is small), so this equation tells us that most of the current from the current source goes through the load, but obviously this can't be correct if the load resistance is much higher than the Norton resistance.

So, you'll have to make a modification to your current division equation.
 
axmls said:
So, you'll have to make a modification to your current division equation.

IL = (I_Norton*R_Norton/(RL + R_Norton))

Is that correct?
 
Correct. Just remember that with current division, the current is multiplied by the resistance of the branch whose current you don't want divided by the sum of the two branch resistances. Looking at extreme cases like I did above can help you to remember.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Marcin H

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
44
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K