Current does not always choose the path of least resistance....?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies that electric current does not always follow the path of least resistance, particularly when there is no potential difference across the least resistant path. Participants highlighted that current travels in loops, necessitating consideration of the entire loop's resistance. For example, in a parallel circuit with a 100Ω and a 99Ω resistor, current flows through both resistors, with a greater proportion through the 99Ω resistor. Additionally, factors such as capacitance, inductance, and reliability components can influence current flow.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Ohm's Law and basic circuit theory
  • Familiarity with parallel and series circuits
  • Knowledge of resistance, capacitance, and inductance
  • Concept of potential difference in electrical circuits
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of capacitance and inductance on current flow in circuits
  • Study the principles of parallel circuits and current distribution
  • Explore reliability components in electrical design and their functions
  • Learn about energy dissipation in electrical circuits and its implications
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, physics students, and anyone interested in understanding the complexities of current flow in electrical circuits.

fog37
Messages
1,566
Reaction score
108
Hello Forum,

Electric current usually goes down the path of least resistance if it can. However, there are situations in which it prefers to go through a path of more resistance if the path of least resistance has no potential difference across.
Are my statements correct?

For example, see the circuit below where the current does not pass through the red segment of the circuit because it has no potential a difference across and could be removed without affecting the circuit:

upload_2015-9-29_7-21-55.png


thanks!
 

Attachments

  • upload_2015-9-29_7-19-40.png
    upload_2015-9-29_7-19-40.png
    2.1 KB · Views: 1,138
Engineering news on Phys.org
Yes, your statement is correct. Current does not always follow the path of least resistance. Your example is a little misguided though.

Current travels in loops. so the entire loop resistance needs to be considered.

But suppose we have a 100Ω resistor in parallel with a 99Ω resistor. Some current will flow in each rather than all of it flowing in the path of least resistance, the 99Ω resistor.
(More will flow in the 99Ω than the 100Ω though.)

Also there are capacitance, inductance, and occasionally relativistic effects that affect the current flow.
 
It goes through all paths. Some goes through the bird perching on the high voltage electric supply cables. But it goes in the 'laziest' way possible, it goes in such a way that it heats (aka dissipates energy) the least possible, given the constraints. So it mostly goes through the cable not the bird. There was a thread about it by a guy who discovered this (not the first unfortunately) here.
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/power-dissipation-in-parallel-circuit.607708/

You need read only posts 1 and 22.
 
fog37 said:
For example, see the circuit below where the current does not pass through the red segment of the circuit because it has no potential a difference across and could be removed without affecting the circuit:

theoretically yes!

warning: this is a tangent and not really related to the main point of your post.
there are times where seemingly useless bits of circuitry or components will exist is a circuit. They will for all normal operating conditions and will not effect operation if removed. In many cases, these components are there for failure prevention or reliability reasons in case of failure.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K